Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
The issue before the Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:18 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2008 WL 192282, *1 (Cal.App. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:34 pm
This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:28 pm
The Fryeburg Trust appealed from the judgment of the Superior Court affirming, pursuant to M.R. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
Anderson pointed to no authority, nor was the Court aware of any, that contemplates extending this concept beyond very young children in that specific situation. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
In Van Asdale v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:19 am
As a new Ontario Superior Court ruling sheds light on the challenges of getting legal aid representation in southwestern parts of the province, Legal Aid Ontario is defending its record in the face of tight funding circumstances.The ruling came in R. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
The Superior Court in Mangel relied on its own 2011 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
The Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:16 am
In Boston Housing Auth. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court decision Serrano v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:18 pm
The court of appeals recently decided State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:18 pm
The court of appeals recently decided State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
Defendant became angry, copied the wedding picture at home, added the captions, and hung them in his office “in the union house. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 9:51 am
" In CRDA v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:34 am
The Ontario Court of Justice acquitted Castonguay, but that decision was reversed by the Superior Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 1:59 pm
Authored by: Jim Greenfield and Clayton Graham This week, the Division One Court of Appeals filed its opinion in the case of Connor v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
While represented by counsel, the Shireys voluntarily bargained for and agreed upon a settlement on all issues of alimony, child custody and support, and equitable distribution, which was reduced to writing, signed by all parties and was jointly presented to the court and entered as a Consent Order in the Mecklenburg County Clerk of Superior Court on 24 May 2016. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
