Search for: "Howard Bashman" Results 101 - 120 of 930
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2015, 2:02 pm by David Lat
When Howard Bashman (of our sister site How Appealing) talks, the U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 11:59 am by Patricia W. Moore
Howard Bashman at How Appealing brought attention to a post by Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker about a possible upcoming “disaster” for liberals in the October 2015 term in the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 6:20 am by Robert Ambrogi
Compared to a prolific blogging machine such as Howard Bashman or even a consistent two-posts-a-day blogger such as Scott Greenfield, that is a relatively paltry output. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:30 pm
Howard Bashman is the prolific author of the long-running appellate blog "How Appealing," a daily must-read for the appellate practitioner who wants to cover all of the bases. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:57 pm
As Howard Bashman has very ably chronicled at How Appealing, the proposal to limit the word count in federal court appears to be progressing via a compromise that would reduce the word count from 14K to 13K. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 6:22 am by David Lat
[Capital Business / Washington Post] * More from Howard Bashman about the misadventures of Howard Shipley, the Foley & Lardner partner who might get spanked by SCOTUS for a bizarre filing. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
Howard Bashman has extensive analysis here, here, and here. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered last week’s filing for this blog, while How Appealing’s Howard Bashman has a two-part analysis (here and here) of the issues and potential outcomes in the proceeding. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:41 am by David Markus
Here is the intro from Howard Bashman's (from How Appealing) comment against the rule:The observation “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” properly appears toinform this Committee’s approach to amending the Federal Rules ofAppellate Procedure. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
If you read Howard Bashman’s appellate blog, How Appealing (and honestly if you are a lawyer and read this blog you probably do) then you may have noticed that there is a proposal to change the default length of appellate briefs in federal court (from 14,000 words to 12,500 words). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:53 am by Larisa Vaysman
 As Howard Bashman of “How Appealing” puts it, this makes the proposed decrease seem like “a solution in search of a problem. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 10:13 am
Thanks to Howard Bashman (How Appealing) for the pointer. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:19 pm by Laura Appleman
  (hat tip:  Legal Times & Howard Bashman) 2) Leon Nefakh has a fascinating piece in Slate today discussing jury bias in the Tsarnaev, Eton Patz, and Colorado shooting jury trials 3) The New York Times recently held one of their "Room for Debate" online forums on whether Tsarnaev's trial should be moved, featuring Valerie Hans, Jeffrey Abramson, Lincoln Caplan, Richard Lind, Thaddeus Hoffmeister, and myself. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:34 pm
”) Thanks to Howard Bashman (How Appealing) for the pointer. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:54 am
Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSblog, Don Cruse at the Supreme Court of Texas Blog, Howard Bashman at How Appealing, Glenn Reynolds at Instapundit, and Steven F. [read post]