Search for: "Howard Wasserman" Results 1 - 20 of 515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2018, 1:00 pm by Adam Steinman
Now on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is Howard Wasserman’s essay, A Step Toward a Proper Understanding of Constitutional Litigation. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman points out that Nieves v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the Korematsu development comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
(Exceptions are posts by Stephen Sachs and Howard Wasserman.) [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “[t]he dispute leaves open whether SCOTUS could review decisions by modern administrative agencies (something Congress has never purported to do). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman suggests that “the court traded a difficult-to-prove issues on the effect of probable cause on individual retaliation for a different set of difficult-to-prove issues surrounding the establishment of municipal liability. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:45 pm by Jeff Schmitt
Howard Wasserman suggests that, because the Court hears so few cases, it should do a better job of selecting cases that provide a vehicle for rulemaking to guide the lower Courts. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from the First Amendment Blog, Jennifer Tiedemann at the Goldwater Institute, Adav Noti at Take Care, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, and Richard Hasen at Slate, who concludes that “the opinion shows a more realistic and functional understanding of the political process than the court has shown in campaign finance cases. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Michael Dorf at his eponymous blog, Robert George in an op-ed for The New York Times, the editorial board of The Washington Post, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Jennifer Rubin in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Erica Goldberg at PrawfsBlawg, Jennifer Finney Boylan in an op-ed for The New York Times, Noah Feldman in an op-ed for Bloomberg, Lisa Keen at Keen News Service, Michael Farris at National Review, Mark Joseph Stern at… [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:39 am by SHG
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wrote a sentence that was astounding.* As professors, our focus is not on what we discuss in class but how we discuss it. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman shares his impressions of “RBG,” the new documentary about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:13 am by Lawrence Solum
Howard Wasserman (Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law) has posted Police Misconduct, Video Recording, and Procedural Barriers to Rights Enforcement (96 N.C. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
14 May 2018, 2:06 pm by Andrew Hamm
.: Howard Wasserman analyzed the opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
About PowerPoint Jeff Schmitt (Dayton), Using PowerPoint in Class Howard Wasserman (Florida International), More on PowerPoint [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wonders “whether the lack of interest in the scope of the injunction hints at where the Court will come down on the merits. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on the case comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg and the editorial board of The New York Times. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm by Marty Lederman
”I am not going to go into much detail here about the merits of the “global injunction” question, which have been extensively debated in a series of recent articles by scholars such as Sam Bray, Amanda Frost, Zayn Siddique, and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
  Background here.At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman says "now we will get to see if Naruto loses on the merits (as he should, because the scope of a statute is a merits issue) or on standing grounds (as the argument sounded the court was heading). [read post]