Search for: "Howard Wasserman" Results 221 - 240 of 545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who discusses the timing for a successor at PrawfsBlawg; from Kent Scheidegger, who criticizes the record of Judge Jane Kelly in capital cases at Crime and Consequences; and in an op-ed for USA Today, where Eric Wang argues that, although we “may not know for sure exactly what Scalia would have thought about the merits of the arguments now being made about who should appoint his successor,” “we do know what he would have… [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:04 am by Andrew Hamm
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg criticizes her proposal (again, tongue in cheek). [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
Finally, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg analyzes legal aspects of this question. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Howard Wasserman, PrawfsBlawg] Shackled Philly priest died in prison, accused by “Billy Doe. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses the Court’s summary opinion in James v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
More, Alison Frankel/Reuters, Howard Wasserman/Prawfs; earlier here and here] Tags: class actions, Supreme Court, WO writings Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Howard Wasserman for this blog, Mark Walsh of Education Week, and NPR’s Nina Totenberg; Wasserman also has additional commentary on the argument at PrawfsBlawg, and Ruthann Robson weighs in at Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am by Amy Howe
  Howard Wasserman previewed the case for this blog, while Mark Denton and Jessica Kim do the same for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman weighs in on last week’s order by Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore on same-sex marriages in that state. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
”  Other coverage of Moore’s actions comes from Mike Cason of Al.com; commentary comes from Marty Lederman at Balkinization and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 11:38 am by Steve Lubet
At the always interesting PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman has posted an astute observation about Chief Justice Roberts’s Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 6:13 am by Jessica Berch
So, on December 31, as both the blogging and the year are set to expire, I find myself looking forward to next year -- where one resolution will be to do more blogging, at least if Howard Wasserman will have me back. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:03 am by Walter Olson
The makers of the controversial advocacy film on sexual assault, “The Hunting Ground,” have suggested that by criticizing the film as unfair, Harvard law professors might be creating a hostile environment at their school, which itself might violate Title IX [Samantha Harris, FIRE; The Crimson; Paul Horwitz and Howard Wasserman, PrawfsBlawg; compare recent University of Mary Washington case, in which dean was said to violate Title IX by talking back publicly against… [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Wasserman, The Process of Marriage Equality, (Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 243-335, 2016 Forthcoming).Anthony C. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman weighs in on comments by Justice Scalia (and criticism thereof) on the Court’s opinion striking down state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
  As Howard Wasserman reports for this blog, the Court ruled that “a three-judge district court must be convened in any action challenging the constitutionality of the apportionment of congressional districts, and that single judges do not have discretion to decline to refer an otherwise-qualifying case. [read post]