Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 301 - 320
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who focuses on Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in a post at PrawfsBlawg, from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
Commentary comes from Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times, NPR’s To the Point (audio), Steven Mazie in an explainer for The Economist, Amy Davidson at The New Yorker, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Erwin Chemerinsky at ACSblog, Janson Wu at ACSblog, Suzanne Goldberg at ACSblog, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, David Fontana and Donald Braman in The Washington Post, Judith Schaeffer in USA Today, Gene Schaerr at The Daily Signal (who had another post there earlier this week), Ryan… [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:42 am
Commentary comes from Lisa Keen at the Keen News Service, Leslie Griffin at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Noah Novogrodsky at the Human Rights at Home Blog, Bill Blum at TruthDig, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Carl Esbeck at The Public Discourse, Ryan Anderson at The Daily Signal and USA Today, from Mark Strasser at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Online 17 (2015)).Howard M. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 9:33 pm
" Law professor Howard M. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
Coverage comes from Howard Wasserman for this blog and from Tony Mauro for the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), with commentary from Carl Smith at Procedurally Taxing. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Commentary comes from Steve Vladeck at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Nicole Huberfeld at HealthLawProf Blog, and Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:42 am
Some lawprofs, like Eugene Volokh, Scott Lemieux and Howard Wasserman, have taken the position that, vile as this may be, it’s exactly what the First Amendment protects. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 12:33 pm
This is my last post for this stint (my third) on Prawfsblawg and I want to thank again for inviting me Howard Wasserman and the others who are doing the work of keeping going what Dan Markel, ZT”L started. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:51 pm
As reported on this blog by Howard Wasserman, he has advised Alabama probate judges to ignore an Alabama federal district court’s ruling that Alabama’s ban on same sex marriage is unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 11:00 am
Over at Prawfs, Howard Wasserman has an interesting commentary about the legal mess right now in Alabama over whether probate judges should issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am
And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman predicts that “Kagan being ‘conflicted’ about this will not move the needle at all, [because] . . . the collegiality norms on the Court mean that, as long as one Justice remains strongly opposed to cameras, the rest of the Justices are never going to push the issue. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Howard Wasserman covered the ruling for this blog, with other coverage from Taylor Gillan of JURIST. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman cites “the limits of the judicial role” as a possible reason why the late Justice Thurgood Marshall is “never in the conversation about civil rights icon[s]. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman considers whether Congress could or should change how the Chief Justice is selected. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:57 am
Howard M. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm
See also Howard Wasserman's analysis. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:01 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman weighs in on Warger v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm
Times, earlier] More thoughts on pros and cons of police cameras [Howard Wasserman/Prawfs, Scott Greenfield] Equal time: Heather Mac Donald’s perspective on Ferguson, policing, and race food for thought even if different from ours [City Journal; our earlier coverage of Ferguson] “15-year mandatory minimum federal sentence for possessing shotgun shells (no shotgun) almost 20 years after past felonies” [Volokh] How much criminal culpability for battered… [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:31 am
Over on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is an essay by Howard Wasserman entitled Judicial Retention Meets Due Process. [read post]
