Search for: "Howard Wasserman" Results 361 - 380 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2021, 8:08 am by Howard Wasserman
Our fourth post explained that providers and advocates will have to raise their constitutional challenges to SB8 in a defensive posture in state court after being sued by a claimant for violating SB8. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:42 am by Steve Lubet
Some readers may recall my exchange with Howard Wasserman last April, in which we discussed the anti-Semitic implications of a cartoon in the International New York Times. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:59 am by James Romoser
” At Prawfs Blawg, Howard Wasserman reflects on the Ginsburg-Marshall comparison as well. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the Korematsu development comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, here and here. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Hera Arsen and Gustavo Suarez for the Ogletree Deakins blog, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg (who also discusses the decision in Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman remarks on the “strategic” decision of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to assign the opinion to Kavanaugh, “the unexpected member of the majority. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Adam Chandler
Howard Wasserman of Prawfsblawg and Mauro agree that the case does not interest many people, but both find reasons to pay attention. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
Commentary related to the decision comes from Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg, Nancy LeTourneau at Washington Monthly, and Irene Scharf at the Human Rights at Home Blog. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman asks which “volume of United States Reports has the greatest number of canonical or important cases. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:43 pm by Dawinder "Dave" S. Sidhu
  PrawfsBlawg's own Professor Howard Wasserman stated that, “legal academics have seized on The Wire because it shows (in the most realistic and accurate way possible) the public the judicial and political systems . . . that most of the public never sees or experiences first-hand. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am by Nabiha Syed
” Briefly: Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg discusses why the Court has not yet ruled on any of the free speech cases from this Term. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:40 pm by Josh Blackman
My colleagues Howard Wasserman and Rocky Rhodes predict that Braid will file a Section 1983 suit against Stilley. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman weighs in on comments by Justice Scalia (and criticism thereof) on the Court’s opinion striking down state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 2:11 am by Steve Lubet
Writing on Prawfs, Howard Wasserman adds the obvious names Thurgood Marshall and William Howard Taft, to which I would add Louis Brandeis. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:59 am by Walter Olson
As Howard Wasserman, writing at PrawfsBlawg, notes: The resources argument (putting aside whether it has any merit) strikes me as inapposite in this case. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 3:18 am
has appeared in many top law reviews and peer-reviewed journals and we are hopeful that the same will be true of the 11 papers we will workshop next week at UM Law," said Markel.Among those participating in the conference are UM Law Professors Ben Depoorter and Charlton Copeland; Dan Markel andLesley Wexler from Florida State University College of Law; Tommy Crocker from the University of South Carolina School of… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:39 am by Amy Howe
Moss came from Richard Wolf of USA Today and from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who suggests that the decision to grant review “doesn’t bode well” for the Ninth Circuit’s decision allowing the case against the Secret Service agents to proceed. [read post]