Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 401 - 420
of 547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 7:57 am
Howard M. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:20 pm
Check out Howard Wasserman on George Will on Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg notes those posts and others. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman expresses doubt that the statute will pass constitutional muster, but in a second post he offers a reluctant defense of the revised statute. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:30 am
At a previous symposium, FIU law prof Howard Wasserman presented a paper. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:51 am
” By contrast, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg concludes after having read the transcript of the argument that he has “no idea how this is going to come out. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:45 pm
Phelps page: Everything you need to know about the case, including expert commentary, the oral argument transcript, and links to amicus and merits briefs; Howard Wasserman's post on PrawfsBlawg - with links to lots of other law prof posts on the topic; Cardozo Law Review's online symposium on the case entitled, aptly enough, "Funerals, Fire, and Brimstone," with full-text articles from First Amendment scholars on how the case should be decided. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:23 am
” PrawfsBlawg writer Howard Wasserman also has a posting on ideology and free speech at the Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Blawg Review is a blog carnival that rotates to a different law site every week, usually emphasizing a specific theme. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:06 am
Howard Wasserman has a similar analysis in a post at PrawsfBlawg, as do Jonathan Adler of the Volokh Conspiracy, Emily Bazelon of Slate, Tony Mauro of the BLT, and Lyle Denniston of this blog. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:22 pm
As Howard Wasserman notes, this would be a really good semester to be teaching federal courts. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:41 am
Howard Wasserman, who has raised various objections in the past, finds the bill that just passed the Senate “a dramatic improvement over earlier versions. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
(from May 30, 2010), Howard Wasserman's Why is Steroids Use Considered Cheating (Oct. 10, 2006) and Greg Skidmore's Performance-Enhancing Surgery and Sports (April 21, 2005). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:12 am
Howard Wasserman argues at PrawfsBlawg that the Supreme Court’s decision in Iqbal, despite its flaws, does not impose substantially heightened pleading requirements on civil rights cases. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:23 am
Tim Epstein addressed the tort implications of cheerleading in his 2006 post, From Poms to Pain, and more recently Tim, Marc Edelman, and Howard Wasserman have all considered Wisconsin courts' handling of cheerleading as a contact sport and the impact on Title IX, particularly in the Noffke v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:07 pm
Other participants included Dan Markel (Florida State), Hillel Levin (Georgia), and Howard Wasserman (Florida International). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
Howard Wasserman says at ACSblog that Kagan “laid out a pretty good map of how to attack” the judge-umpire analogy, though he expects it will live longer still. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
The Chicago Tribune’s Jonah Goldberg and Howard M. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:02 pm
With the case being released on a Friday during Wimbledon (see Howard Wasserman's post below about the longest match in the history of professional tennis), most mainstream news outlets probably won't write about the case until next week. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
Daniel Fisher of Forbes summarizes Justice Scalia’s opinion for the Court, while Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr offers some background on the case and PrawfsBlawg’s Howard Wasserman praises the ruling’s clarification of “the jurisdiction/merits divide as to federal statutes. [read post]
