Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 421 - 440
of 599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses the Court’s summary opinion in James v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
At PrawfsBlog, Howard Wasserman also explores possible congressional or state actions that could simultaneously allow willing shareholders to opt in to election-related activities while limiting the broader role of corporate expenditures. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:23 am
Tim Epstein addressed the tort implications of cheerleading in his 2006 post, From Poms to Pain, and more recently Tim, Marc Edelman, and Howard Wasserman have all considered Wisconsin courts' handling of cheerleading as a contact sport and the impact on Title IX, particularly in the Noffke v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg notes those posts and others. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:31 am
Florida International University law professor Howard Wasserman, in a 2003 legal study, said professional athlete silent protesting against anthems is one of several forms of “symbolic counter-speech. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm
Howard Wasserman, a few weeks ago, made a "modest proposal" to ban PowerPoint and laptop use altogether. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:53 pm
Rev. 113 (1995); but see Howard Wasserman, Structural Principles and Presidential Succession, 90 Ky. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Howard County, Maryland, 377 Md. 55, 832 A.2d 170 (2003). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
(Thanks to Howard Bashman for the link.) [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View; Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog; Roger Pilon at the Cato Institute; Emma Green of The Atlantic; Amanda Marcotte at Slate; Jonathan Keim at National Review; Mark Tushnet of Balkinization; Amanda Terkel for the Huffington Post; Matthew Schettenhelm for the IMLA; Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg; Ed Whelan at National Review; Ed Mannino on his personal blog; Sally Kohn of the Daily Beast; Simon Waxman at… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
Howard Wasserman and my colleague Rocky Rhodes explain this point well. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman suggests that “the court traded a difficult-to-prove issues on the effect of probable cause on individual retaliation for a different set of difficult-to-prove issues surrounding the establishment of municipal liability. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 4:15 am
And then, the point having already been made, prawf Howard Wasserman dove into the cold waters of risk by standing alongside Horwitz. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
“Rocky” Rhodes & Howard M. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” PrawfsBlawg has commentary on the decision from Howard Wasserman here, Stephen Sachs here, and Cassandra Roberts [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:39 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wrote a sentence that was astounding.* As professors, our focus is not on what we discuss in class but how we discuss it. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:46 pm
See also Howard Wasserman for more. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:04 am
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, echoing Justice Ginsburg’s dissent, argues that “[i]t makes no sense for a statute's private right of action not to be coextensive with the substantive law being applied”: Ginsburg is correct that there should be a link, not separation, between prohibited activities and authorized remedies. [read post]
