Search for: "Howard Wasserman" Results 441 - 460 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 6:04 am by Isaac Park
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, echoing Justice Ginsburg’s dissent, argues that “[i]t makes no sense for a statute's private right of action not to be coextensive with the substantive law being applied”: Ginsburg is correct that there should be a link, not separation, between prohibited activities and authorized remedies. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s opinion analysis comes from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am by Adam Chandler
Nicastro drew the attention of at least one commentator, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:21 am by Amanda Frost
 As professor Howard Wasserman suggests, a better name might be “universal injunction,” because the debate is about whether injunctions can require the federal government to cease enforcing a law against nonparties, not whether the injunctions should apply nationwide. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:02 am
  Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg picked up on Frank's video as well, and runs with it in a different direction altogether. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
” Former Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean declared the identical position: “Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman reports on Monday’s order denying review in Scott v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
Finally, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg analyzes legal aspects of this question. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
"Howard Wasserman (Florida International) even more so:"[T]he evaluation of facts as more or less likely (such as the explanation for a policy decision and resulting governmental conduct) really ought to be for a jury. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s preview came from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:00 am by Michael McCann
(from May 30, 2010), Howard Wasserman's Why is Steroids Use Considered Cheating (Oct. 10, 2006) and Greg Skidmore's Performance-Enhancing Surgery and Sports (April 21, 2005). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm by Anna Christensen
  Daniel Fisher of Forbes summarizes Justice Scalia’s opinion for the Court, while Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr offers some background on the case and PrawfsBlawg’s Howard Wasserman praises the ruling’s clarification of “the jurisdiction/merits divide as to federal statutes. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:06 am by Usha Rodrigues
  There's also been an interesting discussion on dual-academic couples (a topic close to the Glom heart), started by Jeffrey Harrison, and continued by Howard Wasserman, and Jennifer Hendricks. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  Baer suggests that a decision the other way “would have reduced the Court’s credibility with police departments,” while Howard Wasserman argues that the case “marks another gap between constitutional rights and constitutional remedies. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am by Erin Miller
  The Federalist Society website also has an ongoing debate for scholars on the decision, with the latest commentary by law professors Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am by Jay Willis
  At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman expresses concern that the Court will use the case to “further limit the scope of public-space expression. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am by Matt Sundquist
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg analyzes the diverse legislative proposals made to rectify the complications arising from the Iqbal decision. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:23 am by Michael McCann
(from May 30, 2010), Howard Wasserman's Why is Steroids Use Considered Cheating (Oct. 10, 2006) and Greg Skidmore's Performance-Enhancing Surgery and Sports (April 21, 2005). [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who focuses on Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in a post at PrawfsBlawg, from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]