Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 441 - 460
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
United States), and from Cassandra Robertson and Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 8:57 am
For an excellent analysis of the flaws of that case, see Howard Wasserman's short piece here . [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Lyle Denniston covered the latest developments for this blog, with other commentary coming from Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg, Steven Mazie for The Economist, and Robin Wilson at the Illinois Law Faculty Blog. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in King comes from Laurence Tribe in The Boston Globe, Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times, Adam Zimmerman at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re at PrawfsBlawg, Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog, Richard Pierce at the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Leland Beck at the Federal Regulations Advisor, Lisa Keen of the Keen News Service, Joan Krause at Hamilton and… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
Cooper, which asks whether the Constitution gives Congress power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement, comes from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wonders “whether the lack of interest in the scope of the injunction hints at where the Court will come down on the merits. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
” More reporting comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, in an expanded version of a story that Dan included yesterday, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Bill Mears of CNN, Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, and Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
Finally, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg analyzes legal aspects of this question. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who focuses on Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in a post at PrawfsBlawg, from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
Daniel Fisher of Forbes summarizes Justice Scalia’s opinion for the Court, while Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr offers some background on the case and PrawfsBlawg’s Howard Wasserman praises the ruling’s clarification of “the jurisdiction/merits divide as to federal statutes. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman cites “the limits of the judicial role” as a possible reason why the late Justice Thurgood Marshall is “never in the conversation about civil rights icon[s]. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:12 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses possible reasons why the Court has not yet issued its opinion in the Facebook threats case Elonis v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman analyzes the new lawsuit in the context of the Court's decision last Term in Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
The Federalist Society website also has an ongoing debate for scholars on the decision, with the latest commentary by law professors Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:32 am
Howard Wasserman notes that: The problem is an (anecdotal) strong resistance in the legal market to do so. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
As Howard Wasserman adds at the end, there is a federal case out of Florida that rejected the “true threat” analysis, but it’s neither precedent nor principled. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:07 am
In a follow-up, Howard Wasserman raised questions about the reciprocity aspect, what professors called students. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
At Prawfsblawg, Howard Wasserman parses Omari’s tale of strength in the face of victimhood. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
” And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that today marks the seventieth anniversary of the death of Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, which left the Court with just seven members. [read post]
