Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 441 - 460
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm
(Eugene Volokh and Howard Wasserman explain the doctrine). [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:12 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses possible reasons why the Court has not yet issued its opinion in the Facebook threats case Elonis v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who focuses on Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in a post at PrawfsBlawg, from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks ahead to the next chapter in the Supreme Court vacancy saga, observing that “when the system breaks down is when strange compromises–that leave no one satisfied–can find a footing. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Baer suggests that a decision the other way “would have reduced the Court’s credibility with police departments,” while Howard Wasserman argues that the case “marks another gap between constitutional rights and constitutional remedies. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman considers whether Congress could or should change how the Chief Justice is selected. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Howard Wasserman covered the ruling for this blog, with other coverage from Taylor Gillan of JURIST. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Howard Wasserman agrees at Prawfsblawg. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman analyzes the new lawsuit in the context of the Court's decision last Term in Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog; commentary on the decision comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who contends that, although the unanimous opinion by Justice Ginsburg “[s]ounds simple enough, . . . inside the opinion is a lot of really bad stuff”; from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who argues that the decision is “important” because “[i]t further narrows the space for claiming First Amendment… [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
"Howard Wasserman (Florida International) even more so:"[T]he evaluation of facts as more or less likely (such as the explanation for a policy decision and resulting governmental conduct) really ought to be for a jury. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
(from May 30, 2010), Howard Wasserman's Why is Steroids Use Considered Cheating (Oct. 10, 2006) and Greg Skidmore's Performance-Enhancing Surgery and Sports (April 21, 2005). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Lyle Denniston covered the latest developments for this blog, with other commentary coming from Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg, Steven Mazie for The Economist, and Robin Wilson at the Illinois Law Faculty Blog. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
Finally, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg analyzes legal aspects of this question. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in King comes from Laurence Tribe in The Boston Globe, Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times, Adam Zimmerman at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re at PrawfsBlawg, Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog, Richard Pierce at the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Leland Beck at the Federal Regulations Advisor, Lisa Keen of the Keen News Service, Joan Krause at Hamilton and… [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg analyzes the diverse legislative proposals made to rectify the complications arising from the Iqbal decision. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
Howard Wasserman challenges the assumptive reasons offered by the op-ed, and as noted in the comments by other law profs, the extent to which even the assumptive reasons apply varies greatly from school to school, professor to professor. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Commentary and analysis come from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg (here and here), Kevin Snider at JURIST, and Fred Woocher at the Election Law Blog, who discusses what the voting alignment suggests about the Justices’ views of the merits of the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
” And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that today marks the seventieth anniversary of the death of Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, which left the Court with just seven members. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
As Howard Wasserman adds at the end, there is a federal case out of Florida that rejected the “true threat” analysis, but it’s neither precedent nor principled. [read post]
