Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 441 - 460
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am
(Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg takes note of Barnes’s report.) [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:22 am
” Meanwhile, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg ponders why Congress didn’t create a more direct path to the Supreme Court in the first place, “through a three-judge district court, with automatic review to [the Supreme Court]. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:42 am
Professor Howard Wasserman (Florida International) has posted on SSRN his essay, The Demise of ‘Drive-By Jurisdictional Rulings’, 105 Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy 184 (2011). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:10 am
Howard M. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:44 pm
Howard Wasserman says the problem with laws like that "is that they allow government to eliminate the check on misconduct that comes from the public being able to watch/listen to Big Brother and use the recording to document and help prove misconduct. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
Nicastro drew the attention of at least one commentator, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:14 pm
Professor Howard Wasserman assesses pros and cons. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:57 am
Howard M. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:20 pm
Check out Howard Wasserman on George Will on Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am
Howard Wasserman of PrawfsBlawg notes those posts and others. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman expresses doubt that the statute will pass constitutional muster, but in a second post he offers a reluctant defense of the revised statute. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:30 am
At a previous symposium, FIU law prof Howard Wasserman presented a paper. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:51 am
” By contrast, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg concludes after having read the transcript of the argument that he has “no idea how this is going to come out. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:45 pm
Phelps page: Everything you need to know about the case, including expert commentary, the oral argument transcript, and links to amicus and merits briefs; Howard Wasserman's post on PrawfsBlawg - with links to lots of other law prof posts on the topic; Cardozo Law Review's online symposium on the case entitled, aptly enough, "Funerals, Fire, and Brimstone," with full-text articles from First Amendment scholars on how the case should be decided. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:23 am
” PrawfsBlawg writer Howard Wasserman also has a posting on ideology and free speech at the Court. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Blawg Review is a blog carnival that rotates to a different law site every week, usually emphasizing a specific theme. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:06 am
Howard Wasserman has a similar analysis in a post at PrawsfBlawg, as do Jonathan Adler of the Volokh Conspiracy, Emily Bazelon of Slate, Tony Mauro of the BLT, and Lyle Denniston of this blog. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:22 pm
As Howard Wasserman notes, this would be a really good semester to be teaching federal courts. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
Moderator: Professor James Wilets, Nova Southeastern University, Shepard Broad Law Center Speakers: Professor Melissa Waters, Washington University School of Law; Professor Howard Wasserman, Florida International University College of Law; Professor Frank Ravitch, Michigan State University College of Law; Professor Otis Stephens, The University of Tennessee College of Law; Professor Ronald Krotoszynski, The University of Alabama School of Law Supreme Court… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:11 am
Howard Wasserman (Florida International) has posted on SSRN his paper, Civil Rights and Federal Courts: Creating a Two-Course Sequence, 54 St. [read post]
