Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 441 - 460
of 547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 3:42 pm
Howard M. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
Muchnick may be interested in today's commentary by Professor Howard Wasserman (Florida International) over at PrawfsBlawg: Copyright and the (hopefully) end of drive-by jurisdictional rulings. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 am
From Howard Wasserman (FIU) comes news of a torts visitor opening at Florida International University in Miami: Florida International University College of Law invites applications from candidates for one or more visiting faculty positions beginning in Fall 2010. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:08 pm
.: lawprof tired of people carrying on about being dragged through litigation, it’s not as if they’re being held liable [Howard Wasserman, Prawfsblawg] Iceland’s free-press project “is largely symbolic – which is not to say unimportant” [N.Y. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
See Bernie's comment to Howard Wasserman's post (http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2010/02/being-sued-v-being-held-liable.html) about the difference between being sued and being held liable on PrawfsBlawg: It seems to me that the interesting question here is how this set of preconceptions differs, if at all, from the dynamics of blame in our culture more generally.A lawsuit is, for most people not twisted by overexposure to our legal system, about blame. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
The Federalist Society website also has an ongoing debate for scholars on the decision, with the latest commentary by law professors Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:24 pm
Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman in an online Federalist Society roundtable on the recent Supreme Court Citizens United decision. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:08 am
It's getting under way online with participants that include Larry Ribstein (Illinois, Ideoblog) and Howard Wasserman (Florida International, Prawfsblawg).... [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Those who took the time and made the effort to nominate their personal recommendations for Blawg Review of the Year 2009 know how daunting a task it is to single out a half dozen outstanding presentations of Blawg Review in 2009. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Those who took the time and made the effort to nominate their personal recommendations for Blawg Review of the Year 2009 know how daunting a task it is to single out a half dozen outstanding presentations of Blawg Review in 2009. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
At PrawfsBlog, Howard Wasserman also explores possible congressional or state actions that could simultaneously allow willing shareholders to opt in to election-related activities while limiting the broader role of corporate expenditures. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
PPS: I'm just now noticing Howard Wasserman's PrawfsBlawg post, which summarizes these two bills and some additional proposals as well (also courtesy of Ed). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:29 am
Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg analyzes the diverse legislative proposals made to rectify the complications arising from the Iqbal decision. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:08 am
Matt Bodie also speculates about how shareholders might respond to corporations' newfound freedom, and Howard Wasserman comments. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:04 pm
But the idea clicked in my head, though not for the reason Wasserman stated. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
I can understand why Howard Wasserman is trying to make the children in his charge enjoy their experience more. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:15 am
Howard Wasserman asks, Can students enjoy exams just a little bit and is there ahything we can do to help? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
We found Howard Wasserman at the next house, with its glowing jack-o-laterns out front and Black Magic Woman filling the air. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:42 am
Thanks to Prawfsblawg, and especially Howard Wasserman, for the invitation to post some thoughts here. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman analyzes the new lawsuit in the context of the Court's decision last Term in Ashcroft v. [read post]
