Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 461 - 480
of 602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
The Federalist Society website also has an ongoing debate for scholars on the decision, with the latest commentary by law professors Larry Ribstein and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman analyzes the new lawsuit in the context of the Court's decision last Term in Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog; commentary on the decision comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who contends that, although the unanimous opinion by Justice Ginsburg “[s]ounds simple enough, . . . inside the opinion is a lot of really bad stuff”; from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who argues that the decision is “important” because “[i]t further narrows the space for claiming First Amendment… [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
"Howard Wasserman (Florida International) even more so:"[T]he evaluation of facts as more or less likely (such as the explanation for a policy decision and resulting governmental conduct) really ought to be for a jury. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
(from May 30, 2010), Howard Wasserman's Why is Steroids Use Considered Cheating (Oct. 10, 2006) and Greg Skidmore's Performance-Enhancing Surgery and Sports (April 21, 2005). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Lyle Denniston covered the latest developments for this blog, with other commentary coming from Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg, Steven Mazie for The Economist, and Robin Wilson at the Illinois Law Faculty Blog. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
” Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, who remarks that although comments like Cruz’s may be “all posturing, in light of recent polls,” they do “hint that a lame-duck confirmation of Merrick Garland is not in the offing. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses the Chief Justice’s frequent practice of assigning First Amendment opinions to himself. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:22 am
Blog links: University of Wisconsin Law School announcement, here Published obituary, Madison.com, here Guadalupe Luna, at Nuestras Voces Latinas, here Al Brophy, at The Faculty Lounge, here Howard Wasserman, at Prawfsblawg, here Diane Marie Amann, at IntLawGrrls, here Kevin Johnson, at Immigration Law Profs Blog (here) Dan Rodriguez, at Northwestern Law School’s Dean’s Blog, here Brian Leither, at Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports, here In January,… [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
Cooper, which asks whether the Constitution gives Congress power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement, comes from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman responds to a recent essay by Ronald Dworkin in the New York Review of Books on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Bill Mears reports on the summary reversal for CNN; Howard Wasserman weighs in at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:12 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses possible reasons why the Court has not yet issued its opinion in the Facebook threats case Elonis v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Commentary comes from Howard Wasserman, who focuses on Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in a post at PrawfsBlawg, from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks ahead to the next chapter in the Supreme Court vacancy saga, observing that “when the system breaks down is when strange compromises–that leave no one satisfied–can find a footing. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Baer suggests that a decision the other way “would have reduced the Court’s credibility with police departments,” while Howard Wasserman argues that the case “marks another gap between constitutional rights and constitutional remedies. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
” Also at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman considers whether Congress could or should change how the Chief Justice is selected. [read post]
