Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 501 - 520
of 550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent from the court’s decision on Monday to deny review of a lower court’s ruling granting qualified immunity on summary judgment to a police officer who was sued for shooting a suspect, observing that the dissent “highlights the Court’s failure to intervene in this and similar cases in which summary judgment is (erroneously) granted against § 1983 plaintiffs, while… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
[24] Howard M. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Howard Wasserman comments on the scope of nationwide injunctions by analyzing a footnote in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent, and James Phillips examines a footnote in Justice Elena Kagan’s concurrence and argues that it misreads the majority opinion Kagan joined in Our Lady of Guadalupe. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Commentary on Garland’s nomination and the effect that Garland would have on the Court if he were confirmed comes from Howard Wasserman, who at PrawfsBlawg agrees with Geoffrey Stone that Garland would “move the Court left, but not back to the days of a bloc of six reliably liberal Justices”; Erwin Chemerinsky, who in The Atlantic imagines what it might “mean to have five justices on the Supreme Court who were appointed by Democratic… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:31 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes note of the lower court’s actions following the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this term in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Other comments on the argument in Hernández come in two posts at Prawsfblawg from Howard Wasserman, here and here. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
” Additional commentary on the case comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg and the editorial board of The New York Times. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 3:58 am
That’s not really an accurate description nor a realistic concern, as Howard Wasserman explains. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Also weighing in on the President’s remarks were David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Joe Palazzolo at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Greg Sargent of the Washington Post’s The Plum Line blog, and Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post’s The Right Turn blog. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
PPS: I'm just now noticing Howard Wasserman's PrawfsBlawg post, which summarizes these two bills and some additional proposals as well (also courtesy of Ed). [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In an excellent analysis of the case for SCOTUSblog, Professor Howard Wasserman noted that repeated instances of laughter interrupted the oral arguments: “Anyone who believes civil procedure is not funny should read the transcript of Tuesday’s argument in Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In the immediate aftermath of the decision, Howard Wasserman argued that the Court's position was the best approach in light of the Court's efforts to tighten the definition of jurisdiction in recent years. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 10:45 pm
For details, see Wasserman. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:18 am
In private correspondence, another Florida-based law professor, Howard Wasserman (located hundreds of miles away from Gainesville in South Florida), asked a particularly interesting question about the total number of electors who would be eligible to vote after any successful objections. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am
(Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg takes note of Barnes’s report.) [read post]
