Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 501 - 520
of 602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
” And at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that today marks the seventieth anniversary of the death of Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, which left the Court with just seven members. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:07 am
In a follow-up, Howard Wasserman raised questions about the reciprocity aspect, what professors called students. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am
Howard Wasserman and I wrote about this litigation in our article, The Process of Marriage Equality. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
Howard Wasserman challenges the assumptive reasons offered by the op-ed, and as noted in the comments by other law profs, the extent to which even the assumptive reasons apply varies greatly from school to school, professor to professor. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
As Howard Wasserman adds at the end, there is a federal case out of Florida that rejected the “true threat” analysis, but it’s neither precedent nor principled. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
At Prawfsblawg, Howard Wasserman parses Omari’s tale of strength in the face of victimhood. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 12:02 pm
For a more detailed explanation of the procedural obstacles to challenging SB 8, see this excellent article by Charles "Rocky" Rhodes and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
UPDATE: Legal scholar Howard Wasserman comments on this post here: I agree with Ilya that excessive judicial deference is a problem. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
But unlike Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving, whose love story and legal victory in the aptly named case have become iconic cultural references and given birth to a holiday, Palmore did not produce a similar happy ending for Linda Sidoti Palmore and her family.I recently revisited Palmore to write a chapter about it for a forthcoming book, Painting Constitutional Law (edited by Howard Wasserman and M.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman suggests that a “better solution might have been that there is a final judgment in the dismissal order, but that there are prudential limits on a court reviewing a voluntary dismissal, just as there are prudential limits on a court taking appeals from the winners below. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “[i]f any case not on all factual fours with Bivens represents a new context, the majority gets where Justice Thomas wants to go, without the political cost of overrulings. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
(See my article with Howard Wasserman, The Process of Marriage Equality). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
’” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes issue with the baseball analogy. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
(Howard Wasserman and I discussed this type of litigation in The Process After Marriage Equality.) [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” Additional commentary comes from the First Amendment Blog, Jennifer Tiedemann at the Goldwater Institute, Adav Noti at Take Care, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, and Richard Hasen at Slate, who concludes that “the opinion shows a more realistic and functional understanding of the political process than the court has shown in campaign finance cases. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Commentary on Garland’s nomination and the effect that Garland would have on the Court if he were confirmed comes from Howard Wasserman, who at PrawfsBlawg agrees with Geoffrey Stone that Garland would “move the Court left, but not back to the days of a bloc of six reliably liberal Justices”; Erwin Chemerinsky, who in The Atlantic imagines what it might “mean to have five justices on the Supreme Court who were appointed by Democratic… [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at one of next week’s cases, Hall v. [read post]
