Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 521 - 540
of 599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Justice Thomas called for reconsidering qualified immunity in his concurring opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” At Prawfsblawgs, Howard Wasserman argues in favor of a filibuster by Senate Democrats, but notes that “the framing of the strategy is going to be essential” and that “the Democrats need to find their own principle beyond tit-for-tat. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
PPS: I'm just now noticing Howard Wasserman's PrawfsBlawg post, which summarizes these two bills and some additional proposals as well (also courtesy of Ed). [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
A sober legal analysis of the claims comes from Howard Wasserman at the Sports Law Blog (via TortsProf) and a snarky analysis from David Nieporent at Overlawyered;As we get ready for trial, we always wonder about juries and jury selection. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Gorsuch’s dissent emphasized a concern that arose during arguments–that state courts may now have to deal with claims that were untimely by many years,” but explains that “[s]uch timing should not be a significant concern in the mine run of cases. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:53 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman recognizes the validity of Goldberg's point (with the caveat that it's nothing new, which of course is true but fails to address the fact that it's not getting any better, and appears to be getting worse). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 5:02 pm
With the case being released on a Friday during Wimbledon (see Howard Wasserman's post below about the longest match in the history of professional tennis), most mainstream news outlets probably won't write about the case until next week. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
(Howard Wasserman and I discussed this type of litigation in The Process After Marriage Equality.) [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:31 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes note of the lower court’s actions following the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this term in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” Howard Wasserman analyzes both Reed and Walker at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
[24] Howard M. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” Additional commentary comes from the First Amendment Blog, Jennifer Tiedemann at the Goldwater Institute, Adav Noti at Take Care, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, and Richard Hasen at Slate, who concludes that “the opinion shows a more realistic and functional understanding of the political process than the court has shown in campaign finance cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman points out that Nieves v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman looks at one of next week’s cases, Hall v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
Prawfsblawg features two discussions of the process by which opinion-writers are assigned at the Supreme Court and the justices’ use of the assignment power, from Howard Wasserman here and Ian Samuel here. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
Howard Wasserman previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
” Howard Wasserman responds to Fontana’s article on PrawfsBlawg, saying “[t]he whole piece is worth a read” but that he is unconvinced by Fontana’s description of a lack of eligible liberals to serve as federal judges. [read post]
