Search for: "Howard Wasserman" Results 541 - 560 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At Prawfsblawgs, Howard Wasserman argues in favor of a filibuster by Senate Democrats, but notes that “the framing of the strategy is going to be essential” and that “the Democrats need to find their own principle beyond tit-for-tat. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Gorsuch’s dissent emphasized a concern that arose during arguments–that state courts may now have to deal with claims that were untimely by many years,” but explains that “[s]uch timing should not be a significant concern in the mine run of cases. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes issue with liberal complaints about Republican court-packing. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:53 am by SHG
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman recognizes the validity of Goldberg's point (with the caveat that it's nothing new, which of course is true but fails to address the fact that it's not getting any better, and appears to be getting worse). [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Other comments on the argument in Hernández come in two posts at Prawsfblawg from Howard Wasserman, here and here. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am by Derek Bambauer
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
United States, where a defendant was convicted of violating Sarbanes-Oxley’s ‘anti-shredding’ prohibition by throwing illegally caught fish off his boat”; Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who summarizes the case as one in which, “[i]n a nutshell, the Court concludes that the federal prosecutors exceeded the power the statute gave them . . . and thus there is no need to decide whether Congress exceeded the power the Constitution’s treaty and… [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:28 am by SHG
  It started at PrawfsBlawg, with lawprof Howard Wasserman free-riding the coattails of Cornell lawprof Mike Dorf, with the Wass-man noting “Mike share [sic] my view that cameras are a good idea but not a panacea. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
”   Howard Wasserman analyzes both Reed and Walker at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman ponders some process-oriented questions raised by Vance and Mazars and discusses potential implications for future cases. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
  Also weighing in on the President’s remarks were David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Joe Palazzolo at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Greg Sargent of the Washington Post’s The Plum Line blog, and Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post’s The Right Turn blog. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am by Rachel Sachs
  Writing at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman considers the opinion’s discussion of issues of jurisdiction versus issues of substantive law, while Andy Spalding predicts that, after Kiobel, “the next generation of ATS litigation . . . will likely focus to a large extent on the territorial nexus question. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
  At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses the Court and alleged inconsistencies in its First Amendment jurisprudence in the context of “speech-protective” decisions like McCullen. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman points out that Nieves v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on the case comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg and the editorial board of The New York Times. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from Michael Dorf at his eponymous blog, Robert George in an op-ed for The New York Times, the editorial board of The Washington Post, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Jennifer Rubin in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Erica Goldberg at PrawfsBlawg, Jennifer Finney Boylan in an op-ed for The New York Times, Noah Feldman in an op-ed for Bloomberg, Lisa Keen at Keen News Service, Michael Farris at National Review, Mark Joseph Stern at… [read post]