Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 41 - 60
of 599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2021, 10:20 am
Howard Wasserman (Florida International), Academic Feeder Judges: Are Clerkships the Key to Academia? [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
(Ed Kilgore, New York magazine) SCOTUS vacates Knight Foundation, Thomas has things to say (Howard Wasserman, PrawfsBlawg) In Terry v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
” When a lawsuit alleges that a federal law, regulation, or policy violates the Constitution, universal injunctions are generally not the appropriate remedy, according to Howard Wasserman of the Florida International University College of Law. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 7:16 pm
Wasserman, Howard, Zombie Laws (February 2, 2021). [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 2:31 am
Howard Wasserman and M.C Mirow have just published Painting Constitutional Rights: Xavier Cortada's Images of Constitutional Rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm
Wasserman. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Wasserman. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court restores requirements for medication abortions, siding with Trump administration (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Citing Taylor Swift, Supreme Court Seems Set to Back Nominal Damages Suits (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court Considers Expanding Government Liability Over Speech Restrictions — Even After They Were Lifted (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Supreme Court… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Howard M. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
[If Trump’s speech is protected by the First Amendment, then incitement cannot be grounds for impeachment. ] [This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Over the past four years, we have defended many of President Trump's actions as a constitutional matter, while criticizing those actions as a policy matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:36 am
Illegally (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Court Gives Trump a Pass in Census Lawsuit (Kenneth Jost, Jost on Justice) Declining To Rule On The Merits, The Supreme Court Allows Trump’s Census Order To Stand For Now (Michael Bobelian, Forbes) Supreme Court dismisses case on excluding illegal immigrants from census count as ‘riddled’ with ‘speculation’ (Tyler Olson, Bill Mears & Shannon Bream) Malevolence + Incompetence = No Standing (Howard… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Here’s a round-up of other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Justices Rule for Muslim Men Who Sued FBI Agents After Being Placed on No-Fly List (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Supreme Court Says Muslim Men Can Sue FBI Agents In No-Fly List Case (Nina Totenberg, NPR) The final countdown to Donald Trump’s election defeat (Steven Mazie & Idrees Kahloon, The Economist) SC AG Wilson joins Texas in bid in US Supreme Court to overthrow Biden election… [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
(Transcript here; Howard Wasserman's SCOTUSBlog summary here.) [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:06 pm
Jessie Hill (Case-Western Reserve University)(Thanks to Howard Wasserman for the heads up) [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:59 am
” At Prawfs Blawg, Howard Wasserman reflects on the Ginsburg-Marshall comparison as well. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 2:11 am
Writing on Prawfs, Howard Wasserman adds the obvious names Thurgood Marshall and William Howard Taft, to which I would add Louis Brandeis. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 9:26 pm
When Howard Wasserman and Ediberto Roman are right, they're right: Kamala Harris is a natural born citizen eligible to the presidency, and therefore to the vice presidency under the last sentence of the Twelfth Amendment. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:22 pm
Balkin, New Haven – Professor, Yale Law School District of Columbia Cara Hope Drinan – Professor, The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Florida Howard M. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman ponders some process-oriented questions raised by Vance and Mazars and discusses potential implications for future cases. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Howard Wasserman comments on the scope of nationwide injunctions by analyzing a footnote in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent, and James Phillips examines a footnote in Justice Elena Kagan’s concurrence and argues that it misreads the majority opinion Kagan joined in Our Lady of Guadalupe. [read post]
