Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 141 - 160
of 596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” Additional commentary comes from the First Amendment Blog, Jennifer Tiedemann at the Goldwater Institute, Adav Noti at Take Care, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, and Richard Hasen at Slate, who concludes that “the opinion shows a more realistic and functional understanding of the political process than the court has shown in campaign finance cases. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional commentary comes from Michael Dorf at his eponymous blog, Robert George in an op-ed for The New York Times, the editorial board of The Washington Post, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Jennifer Rubin in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Erica Goldberg at PrawfsBlawg, Jennifer Finney Boylan in an op-ed for The New York Times, Noah Feldman in an op-ed for Bloomberg, Lisa Keen at Keen News Service, Michael Farris at National Review, Mark Joseph Stern at… [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:39 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wrote a sentence that was astounding.* As professors, our focus is not on what we discuss in class but how we discuss it. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am
” Howard Wasserman shares his impressions of “RBG,” the new documentary about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
14 May 2018, 2:06 pm
.: Howard Wasserman analyzed the opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:00 am
About PowerPoint Jeff Schmitt (Dayton), Using PowerPoint in Class Howard Wasserman (Florida International), More on PowerPoint [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wonders “whether the lack of interest in the scope of the injunction hints at where the Court will come down on the merits. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
” Additional commentary on the case comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg and the editorial board of The New York Times. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
”I am not going to go into much detail here about the merits of the “global injunction” question, which have been extensively debated in a series of recent articles by scholars such as Sam Bray, Amanda Frost, Zayn Siddique, and Howard Wasserman. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
Background here.At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman says "now we will get to see if Naruto loses on the merits (as he should, because the scope of a statute is a merits issue) or on standing grounds (as the argument sounded the court was heading). [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
Howard Wasserman previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:32 pm
Thanks to Howard Wasserman for the invitation and thanks to the Prawfs readers who commented over the month. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman remarks that the court “conclude[ed] yet again that Congress’ power to ‘change the law’ to push pending litigation to its preferred conclusion is, in practice, unbounded. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:22 pm
Now on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is Howard Wasserman’s essay, The Empirical Truth About Qualified Immunity. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 3:30 am
Howard M. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:17 am
Thanks to Howard Wasserman for the invitation to return to PrawfsBlawg this month! [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
As professor Howard Wasserman suggests, a better name might be “universal injunction,” because the debate is about whether injunctions can require the federal government to cease enforcing a law against nonparties, not whether the injunctions should apply nationwide. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Gorsuch’s dissent emphasized a concern that arose during arguments–that state courts may now have to deal with claims that were untimely by many years,” but explains that “[s]uch timing should not be a significant concern in the mine run of cases. [read post]
