Search for: "Howard v. Commissioners" Results 1 - 20 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 3:36 am
Using tape-recorded testimony in an administrative proceedingMiller v Howard Safir, App. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:26 am
Suspension without payVargo v Safir, 291 A.D.2d 268Although the Appellate Division did not have any difficulty in affirming New York City Police Commissioner Howard Safir's imposing the penalty of dismissal after finding police officer James Vargo guilty of misconduct, it did find that there was a question as to whether Vargo was entitled to back pay.The court said that it appeared that Vargo had been suspended without pay for more than 30 days after he was served… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
Individual serving in major nontenured policy-making or advisory position ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits upon separation Fromer v Commissioner of Labor, 286 AD2d 816 The critical issue in this aspect of the litigation brought by Howard A. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:47 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.htmlFive bills were added:S.1333: A bill to provide for rental assistance for homeless or at-risk Indian veterans.H.R.2860: To amend title II of the Social Security Act to permit American Indian tribal councils to enter into agreements with Commissioner of Social Security to obtain social security coverage for services performed by tribal council members.H.R.2915: To repeal section 3003 of the Carl … [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
Div., First Dept., 291 A.D.2d 268 Although the Appellate Division did not have any difficulty in affirming New York City Police Commissioner Howard Safir's imposing the penalty of dismissal after finding police officer guilty of misconduct, it did find that there was a question as to whether the officer was entitled to back pay. [read post]