Search for: "Howard v. People" Results 241 - 260 of 1,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
In exotic places such as California people regularly sit in saunas and hot tubs with unclothed strangers. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:30 pm by Derek T. Muller
Branton/Howard Law Journal Symposium, "We The People? [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:46 am by Eugene Volokh
The Illinois Supreme Court had earlier held that the Second Amendment secures a right to carry guns (a matter on which courts are split), and on Thursday it held in People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
New York,] to decide whether the Constitution lets the government ask whether people are American citizens. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
, (Croatian Political Science Review (December, 2018)).Christopher Sundby & Suzanna Sherry, Term Limits and Turmoil: Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:05 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In an excellent analysis of the case for SCOTUSblog, Professor Howard Wasserman noted that repeated instances of laughter interrupted the oral arguments: “Anyone who believes civil procedure is not funny should read the transcript of Tuesday’s argument in Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman previewed the case for this blog. [read post]