Search for: "Howard v. State of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 8:00 am
Supreme Court has ended the saga of Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:05 pm
Board of Education, and decided Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
In this month's Costa Mesa, California employment lawyers newsletter, Howard Law attorney Vincent Howard reviewed key California and federal labor and employment law developments from 2011--hot topics that our Riverside, California employment lawyers blog covered over the course last year, including GINA's final regulations, the Supreme Court's ruling in the Walmart v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 10:05 pm
He was named the Stanley V. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:15 pm
Howard [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:59 am
California is also on the list.Florida v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:42 pm
In Howard v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:08 pm
In Balderas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
The court and government erred in giving aggravated felony adjustments for state (California) prior convictions that could, under the categorical appraoch, be for possession of drugs and not selling.US v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:37 am
In the case McGOVERN v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 1:55 pm
"Second, now in today's opinion here from 4/1, footnote 3 says, "We received and considered in association with this appeal the amicus curiae briefs, and responses thereto, of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association filed in support of plaintiffs; and of the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California State Association of Counties & League of California Cities, joined by the California Special Districts… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 pm
The California Supreme Court begins 2016 with a surprise. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:12 pm
(See Loral Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 7:12 pm
(See Loral Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:41 pm
Howard, 480 F.3d at 1013. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
§2254(d) if the California Supreme Court is deemed to have ruled on the question and under the rule of Teague v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:16 pm
(Indeed, California is one of the few states that allows "public attorney general" suits.) [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:53 am
He also represented the State as a Special Deputy in the Anzai v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:31 am
The difference is question wording: fair v. biased.Reporting on the poll are Howard Mintz in the San Jose Mercury-News, Sam Stanton in the Sacramento Bee, and Bob Egelko in the San Francisco Chronicle. [read post]
