Search for: "Howard v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Other scenarios: Howard University Alumni Association should be understood as NFU outside the scope of dilution, as long as it’s a truthful representation—it’s not using Howard as a mark but rather the unitary mark Howard University Alumni Association; the exclusion doesn’t, like other parts of the statute, refer to uses “comprising” the famous mark. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
In 1948, Murray published their first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color, a 700-hundred-page analysis and critique of segregation in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Ark. 2019) (stating that “[t]he fact that the [confidentiality] Agreement does not state a time limitation, but instead applies forever, further supports a finding that it is unenforceable”); Howard Schultz & Assocs. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the words of the California Supreme Court in Balboa Village Island Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
Kise, Howard Kleinhendler, Michael Madaio, Armen Morian, Emily Newman, Sidney Powell, Clifford S. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Judge Finds Eastman Culpable for Ethics Breaches in 2020 Bid to Keep Trump in Power MSN &nd [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:29 am
Today's LA Times has An unexpected check on Supreme Court’s sharp move right: Justice KavanaughLaw360 has 5 Supreme Court Cases to Watch This Fall, 'Administrative State' Attacks Soar To High Court Crescendo and First-Time Advocates Dominate High Court's Fall Schedule, the last of which begins:Solo practitioner Howard Bashman had almost given up all hope on his goal of arguing before the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]