Search for: "Howard v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, arguably the most important piece of law enacted anywhere in the world over the last two centuries, opens majestically with these words: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am by Above the Law
 Third, for additional commentary about both recusal decisions, check out Howard Wasserman’s (FIU Law) post — “Courtroom Policies and Constitutional Substance” — at PrawfsBlawg here [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
"  You are there for the argument of King v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Hamilton is the Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:06 am by centerforartlaw
The complaint aptly states that the story of how the exhibition came to be is “a truth stranger than fiction. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm by Ben Vernia
”The False Claims Act imposes treble damages and penalties on those who knowingly and falsely claim money from the United States or knowingly fail to pay money owed to the United States. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]