Search for: "Howard v. State of California"
Results 221 - 240
of 526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
In the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz reports on the wait in California for the decision in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage, and what the Court’s decision might mean for that state. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
State ex rel Elvis Presley v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:43 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Glossip v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
For example, in discussing Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
The test the California courts have developed over the 20th Century for classifying workers isn’t very helpful in addressing this 21st Century problem. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Imburgia, in which the Court will review a conflict between a California state court and the Ninth Circuit over the enforcement of an arbitration agreement that refers to state law. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Nicholas Stephanopoulos looks at the effect that the Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:53 am
He also represented the State as a Special Deputy in the Anzai v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
PolhillCase Number: 13-cv-01729 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: September 24, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 6, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-5 SEC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm
Girardi secured a 4.85 billion dollar settlement from Merck for Vioxx, a 785 million dollar verdict from Lockheed for personal injuries, and a 1.7 billion dollar settlement from the State of California for manipulating natural gas prices. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:40 pm
” That case was Zacchini v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:31 am
The difference is question wording: fair v. biased.Reporting on the poll are Howard Mintz in the San Jose Mercury-News, Sam Stanton in the Sacramento Bee, and Bob Egelko in the San Francisco Chronicle. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Marshall v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
