Search for: "Howard v. State of California"
Results 241 - 260
of 525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
LaserCase number: 09-cv-09144 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: February 12, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-30 SEC v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:30 pm
” Holmes sued Love in California state court for $8 million, arguing that the tweet accused Holmes of bribery. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:29 am
Howard Mintz has the story for the San Jose Mercury News. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
A California appellate court addressed somewhat similar questions with regard to an injury during a big-budget Hollywood film shoot in Barry v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:12 pm
(Thanks to Howard Bashman of the How Appealing blog for the alert to this decision.) [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman has a brief discussion of yesterday’s opinion in Medtronic v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
California. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
” Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman analyzes Tuesday’s opinion in Daimler AG v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
This is a perspective that also conflates public and private law views of entities, be they states or corporations. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Bill Mears reports on the summary reversal for CNN; Howard Wasserman weighs in at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:41 am
Case scheduled Dec 04, 2013 10:00 a.m. at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Other previews come from Jess Bravin and Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal and Vinay Harpalani at ISCOTUSnow, while in the San Jose Mercury News Howard Mintz discusses what the case might mean for California’s Proposition 209, that state’s seventeen-year-old ban on affirmative action. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:29 am
Brown, the Court is revisiting that question in DaimlerChrysler AG v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Howard II, John R. [read post]
