Search for: "Howard v. State of California" Results 21 - 40 of 581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2014, 8:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The difference is question wording: fair v. biased.Reporting on the poll are Howard Mintz in the San Jose Mercury-News, Sam Stanton in the Sacramento Bee, and Bob Egelko in the San Francisco Chronicle. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
A short per curiam opinion issued yesterday by the United States Supreme Court concerning an employment dispute in Oklahoma is likely to result in consternation in California. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 10:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Howard Dean defends his statement that “Hate speech is not protected by the first amendment” by saying: For WAPO and others raising issues about hate speech not being constitutionally protected, read "Chaplinsky v New Hampshire SCOTUS 1942 — Howard Dean (@GovHowardDean) April 22, 2017 I’m pleased to say that I have read Chaplinsky v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am by johntfloyd
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
In any case, we are not bound to follow Rouse (see Howard Contracting v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:51 pm
Berman (D-California) has presented a bill to complement the International Court of Justice’s decision in Mexico v. [read post]