Search for: "Howard v. State of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm
Howard Mintz has this story in the San Jose Mercury-News. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 2:11 pm
The specific state statute, not dissimilar from many States' grandparent visitation laws after the US Supreme Court ruling in Troxel v Granville, states as follows: Cal. [read post]
Oklahoma Supreme Court Reverses Foreclosure Judgment in 'Show Me The Note' Case - U.S. Bank v. Moore
23 Apr 2012, 6:34 am
Bank v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:10 pm
The California Supreme Court ruling in Howard v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:55 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am
Independent Living Center of Southern California, in which California Medicaid providers are challenging the state’s proposed ten-percent-cut to their payments. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
" Martin Oliver v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
Howard Roffman, in turn, supervised Mr. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:40 am
About a month and a half ago, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that Samsung had not waived its "article of manufacture" argument in the first Apple v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:29 am
Brown, the Court is revisiting that question in DaimlerChrysler AG v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:04 am
In the other case, U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman has a brief discussion of yesterday’s opinion in Medtronic v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:09 am
This can lead to seemingly unfair results sometimes, as a Wyoming couple found in Wallace v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
In Howard v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
Howard, 2011 WL 2535555, at *1 (S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
The court held the wrong parties had been named and that sovereign immunity existed as to a RLUIPA damage claim.In Howard v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:01 am
Other states have changed procedures and moved forward with executions, but California has not put anyone to death since 2006 because of the legal battle. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am
Becerra (challenge to California law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” to convey state-prescribed messages), Lozman v. [read post]
