Search for: "Howard v. State of California"
Results 101 - 120
of 580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2020, 9:23 am
The California Supreme Court’s opinion in Howard v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am
McKenna was born in Philadelphia, but his family moved to California in the mid-1850s. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
In the 20th volume, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Howard Gillman, chancellor of the University of California, Irvine, have written “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” which focuses on what the authors see as the troubling directions our conservative justices are now taking insofar as they reject the idea of a wall separating church and state. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
New York is followed by California (44.6 percent of consumption smuggled), Washington (42.8 percent), New Mexico (40.8 percent), and Minnesota (34.6 percent). [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Portland 1.72 $93,755 $54,500 Florida State Univ. 1.73 $81,159 $47,000 Univ. of Notre Dame 1.73 $130,589 $75,500 Univ. of Washington-Seattle 1.74 $109,405 $63,000 Univ. at Buffalo 1.75 $90,928 $52,100 Univ. of California-Irvine 1.75 $119,986 $68,700 Univ. of Akron Main 1.75 $73,756 $42,200 Michigan State Univ. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
Cooper, which asks whether the Constitution gives Congress power to revoke the states’ immunity from suit for copyright infringement, comes from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
This blog’s preview came from Howard Wasserman. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
AOL, Howard v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
For Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times), Howard Fischer reports that in McKinney v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:22 am
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that “California officials are urging the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am
Richard Re analyzes Monday’s opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
” Citing to and quoting from its decision in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
In exotic places such as California people regularly sit in saunas and hot tubs with unclothed strangers. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Gene Editing Judith Daar, University of California Irvine School of Law, Human Germline Genome Editing: Dilemmas in Informed Consent Eileen Kane, Penn State Law, A Volatile Year in Human Genome Editing Myrisha Lewis, Howard University School of Law, The Coming Age of Gene Editing: Medical Promise, Regulation, and the Revival of Decades of Debate Maxwell Mehlman, Case Western Reserve University, Regulating Do-It-Yourself Gene Editing C. [read post]
