Search for: "Howard v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 1,106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Justice Thomas called for reconsidering qualified immunity in his concurring opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:14 am by fvanloon
We at Judicial Watch just filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, on behalf of two California taxpayers, Robin Crest and Howard Myers, asking the court to stop the state from expending $75 million of taxpayer funds to provide direct cash assistance to unlawfully present aliens (Crest et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:01 am by fvanloon
In its April 29 lawsuit on behalf of California taxpayers, Robin Crest and Howard Myers, Judicial Watch alleges that Newsom overstepped his authority and violated federal law when, without affirmative state legislative approval, he took executive action to create DRAIP and provide cash benefits to individuals who otherwise are ineligible for state or federal insurance or other benefits due to their unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:11 pm by fvanloon
We just filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, on behalf of two California taxpayers, Robin Crest and Howard Myers, asking the court to stop the state from expending $75 million of taxpayer funds to provide direct cash assistance to unlawfully present aliens (Crest et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 8:31 am by fvanloon
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced itfiled a lawsuit in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles on behalf of two California taxpayers, Robin Crest and Howard Myers, asking the court to stop the state from expending $75 million of taxpayer funds to provide direct cash assistance to unlawfully present aliens (Crest et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 12:37 am
BackgroundThe background to the case can be stated quite shortly.The parties began cohabiting in 2003, and married in 2005. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 6:38 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Insurance lawyers know the law about insurable interest goes back to 1866, in a United States Supreme Court opinion styled, Howard Fire Ins. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:19 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Lucius Outlaw III (Howard University School of Law) has posted Giving an Acquittal Its Due: Why a Quartet of Sixth Amendment Cases Means the End of United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
In the United States, though, the test was prohibited by the sclerotic Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am by Jackie McDermott
   “Every major medical organization in the United States has come out against these laws, saying that all they do is hurt women’s health rather than help them,” she said. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Ronald Collins
Lazarus is the Howard and Katherine Aibel Professor of Law at Harvard University, where he teaches environmental law, natural resources law, Supreme Court advocacy and torts. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
The Court also allowed the government seven days to pursue its remedies to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:52 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
The Court also allowed the government seven days to pursue its remedies to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]