Search for: "Howard v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 1,108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2012, 7:52 am
Eddie Lee Howard, involving the Federal Arbitration Act, the Supreme Court of the United States indicated that courts are not allowed to address the validity of covenants not to compete before an arbitrator does so. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Goldstein, 6 NY3d 119 [Court of Appeals of New York [2005]. . .; accord Matter of State of New York v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:00 am by Kali Borkoski
United States, in which the Court limited the scope of the “honest services” statute, is in the news again. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 6:47 pm
The payments the trustee did make were made in U.S. dollars, beneficiaries being resident in the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:05 pm
See Bulova Watch, 344 U.S. at 281 (“The issue is whether a United States District Court has jurisdiction to award relief to an American corporation against acts of trademark infringement and unfair competition consummated in a foreign country by a citizen and resident of the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:51 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled SECTION 1. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Howard, supra.The HowardSuperior Court went on to explain that, [a]s [Howard] correctly notes, this Court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am by Liah Caravalho
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:41 am
In the spirit of comity, I would ask then that the President of the United States' change of position on the individual mandate from his stated position in his campaign for the Presidency be considered: The argument about the evil of the individual mandate is all wrong. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:29 am
On April 10, 2014, the United States Court for the District of Maryland denied the Defensdants' Motion for Dismissal or Summary Judgment in Finkle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the property)… [read post]