Search for: "Howard v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 1,104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am by Mary B. McCord
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
  This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around… [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul C. Light
Trump continues to taunt federal employees with fear-mongering about the deep state, pay freezes, and attacks on the merit system. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wonders which opinions will define Stevens’ legacy. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via Tucson.com), Howard Fischer reports that a “decision by Arizona voters in 2000 could minimize the effects on this state of the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court reaffirmed precedent holding that prosecution of the same conduct by separate sovereigns, such as a state and the federal government, does not violate the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am by Kia Rahnama
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]