Search for: "Howard v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 1,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2014, 9:25 am
 The EOG wells are shown on the sketch below; the plaintiffs' tract is in yellow:   EOG filed pooled unit designations for the Knox, Howard, Howard A, and Wylie A units, even though the plaintiffs' leases did not allow pooling. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
Howard Bashman has collected press reports of the argument here and here. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:23 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” He then discussed the Fifteenth Amendment (which granted African American men the right to vote by declaring that the “right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:23 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” He then discussed the Fifteenth Amendment (which granted African American men the right to vote by declaring that the “right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:21 pm
Howard, supra.The Superior Court then began its analysis of Howard’s authentication argument: As Appellant correctly notes, this Court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Conor McEvily
United States, the Court will consider whether four key provisions of S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law, are preempted by federal law.   [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state has asked the Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision blocking enforcement of four provisions of S.B. 1070, its controversial immigration law.  [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” At frESH, Danelle Gagliardi and Matthew Rojas analyze Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]