Search for: "Howden v. State"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 3:06 am
In Ace European Ltd & 5 ors v (1) Howden Group (2) Howden North America Inc (formerly Howden Buffalo Inc) [2012] EWHC 2427 (Comm), Mr Justice Field upheld his prior order granting permission to the claimant insurers (the Claimants), to serve proceedings seeking declaratory relief, out of the jurisdiction.The Claimants were excess public and products liability insurers of the first Defendant and its subsidiary companies from 1995 to 2002. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
In the threshold motion in Maxwell v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:34 am
In Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980, the Court of Appeal ruled that the judge at first instance, Judge Beatson, was entitled to conclude that English proceedings would serve a useful purpose when he refused to set aside a service out of the jurisdiction of negative declaratory proceedings by Faraday against Howden.In the Commercial Court decision, Beatson J refused to set aside the service because he found that the policy in… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:44 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Trademark Licensing Co Ltd & Anor v Leofelis SA [2012] EWCA Civ 985 (23 July 2012) Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980 (20 July 2012) O’Cathail v Transport for London [2012] EWCA Civ 1004 (20 July 2012) Michael & Ors v South Wales Police & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 981 (20 July 2012) Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:50 pm
In Hawkins v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:37 pm
External liability v. internal liability A fundamental difference of management liability under German law compared to, for instance, the United States is that, in most cases, damage claims are not brought by third parties like employees or shareholders but by the company itself. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:40 am
Supreme Court Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (2 November 2011) Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (2 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Angola) & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1238 (01 November 2011) Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249 (01 November 2011) Williams v University of… [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MH, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1112 (14 October 2010) Nouri v Marvi & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1107 (14 October 2010) Norbrook Laboratories Ltd & Anor v Carr & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1108 (14 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Inglis v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2269 (14 October 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Howden, R (on the… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
Justice Roccomo stated in Hartwick v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:29 am
First National State Bank of New Jersey, 432 A.2d 890 (N.J. 1981); Pascale v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm
United States The Washington Post notes that Amazon is revolutionising its delivery system, allowing for delivery to individuals parked vehicles. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:41 am
A version of this article was published previously on the Howden website. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Insurers would be required to pay Appian $500 million if the state supreme court rules that Pegasystems should have won. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
Burkhard is licensed to practice law in Germany and is standing legal counsel to the German operation of the London-based Howden Broking Group. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am
Attorney’s Office in D.C on May 24th, it was revealed that the individuals in question were charged with “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States” and causing injury to museum property in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Sections 6303(b)(2): Touching of, or Injuries to, Property. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
