Search for: "Howells v. Howells"
Results 301 - 320
of 963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2010, 9:23 am
Howell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Carrie Goldberg explained why Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act needs to be changed to hold communication platforms accountable for the safety of its users in light of ongoing litigation in the Herrick v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 6:22 am
Jurecic also shared a ruling in Al Shimari v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Patja Howell shared the latest installment of the Culper Partners Rule of Law Series on the Lawfare Podcast, in which Nate Jones and David Kris spoke with former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick: Fogel shared a petition for rehearing en banc from the appellant in McKeever v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 7:29 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:10 am
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons learned from Doe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:23 pm
Biden, decided yesterday by Chief Judge Beryl Howell (D.D.C.) [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:13 pm
Under the Howell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
Howell also shared an episode of Rational Security in which Scott R. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court decision in Egbert v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:31 pm
From Freeman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia found the FEC regulation 11 CFR §109.10(e)(1)(vi), did not comport with the statutory disclosure requirements of 52 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:06 am
Howell handed the Secret Service and the Obama Administration a setback this week, ruling that White House visitor logs are agency records subject to being produced under the Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. sec. 552] unless shielded by one of the Act's exemptions.The issue of public access to visitors lists has plagued both the Bush and Obama White House occupancies (see "TUOL" posts 9/7/09, 7/23/09), but in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Below is today's Contract law Appellate Court opinion: AC31034 -Caciopoli v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 5:28 am
Patterson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Howell. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:19 pm
Matera et. al. v. [read post]
