Search for: "Hubbell v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
However, the Superior Court decided in Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am by centerforartlaw
If you put the term in the Martindale-Hubbell directory, no names would appear. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:15 am by Rumpole
Joffe practices before federal courts, the United States tax courts and also in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:15 pm
This court case is Southgate Master Fund LLC v United States of America, 06cv2335k, US District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:33 am by Darrin Mish
United States, the high court will decide if the IRS had the right to pass such a ruling. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:12 pm by Levin Papantonio
That motion was initially denied, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is set to take up the matter on appeal on September 19, 2022.Talc Powder Has Cost J&J Billions of DollarsThe pharmaceutical giant is promoting the decision as “part of a worldwide portfolio assessment. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
`”The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that ‘[n]o person . . . shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . . [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm by Levin Papantonio
I am elated that the 3rd Circuit sided on behalf of the thousands of ovarian cancer victims, each of whom are entitled to their day in court by the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In affirming the district court's decision, the United States Supreme Court relied on the ‘collective entity‘ doctrine. [read post]