Search for: "Hudson v. North Carolina"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm
The speech involved in this case was on a matter of public concern, notwithstanding the testimony of Durham attorney Bill Cotter that it sounded like a spat or dispute between two people that might be best settled by the North Carolina State Bar. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
That left five Cline statements: that Hudson had committed “misconduct . . . involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, and corruption”; that Hudson was guilty of “kidnapping the rights of victims and their families”; that Hudson had committed “intentional malicious conduct”; that “this Court is in total and complete violation of the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct”; and that Hudson needed to… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
From North Carolina the News & Observer reports, "Judge takes Cline to task. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 6:54 am
" This court then cited cases from, Arkansas, California, Wisconsin, Illinois, North Carolina, and New York. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
North Carolina v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:13 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Here is a pdf listing collection agencies in South Carolina. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Here is a pdf listing collection agencies in South Carolina. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Judge Davis previously served as a federal district court judge in Maryland; Judges Motz and Wynn served on the intermediate courts of appeal in Maryland and North Carolina respectively. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
"The exercise of general jurisdiction over petitioners, simply because their products reached North Carolina through the stream of commerce, violates the due-process clause," the companies say. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Thornburg of Asheville, N.C., who had declared the plants a “public nuisance” because of their effect on air quality in North Carolina’s scenic western mountains. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
– Enviro.BLR.com, May 5, 2010 A major railway company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged CWA and CERCLA violations for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
More than 40 of the sites are in North Carolina. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:57 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its latest round of decisions on April 15. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:54 am
In modern business litigation in North Carolina, it is increasingly rare to see a complaint that does not contain a claim under G.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
