Search for: "Hudson v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm
In ordering the transfer, Judge Ruben Castillo of the Northern District of Illinois stated, "After a careful review of the Defendants' pending motion to transfer and Plaintiff's response thereto, the pending motion to transfer is granted for the reasons outlined by Judge William Hart in the related case of Hudson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:54 am by Randy Barnett
The criticism is based on a single passage in which Judge Hudson states that the same reasons that render the insurance mandate beyond Congress’s Commerce powers also place it beyond the reach of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by lennyesq
United States, 891 F.2d 24, 25 (1st Cir. 1989) and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:00 am
In Wang v. 161 Hudson, LLC, Zhong Wang sued 161 Hudson, LLC after the scaffolding Wang was using collapsed. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am by Cinthia Macie
  In this respect, European merger control law reflected U.S. antitrust law at or around the time of United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
 Judge Hudson cited the Supreme Court's decision in City of Chicago v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:05 am by Stephen J. Natoli
On June 4th, 2021, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey decided in State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Let's take a closer look at each of these steps.I'm sure you believe me on (1) -- that Central Hudson applied the four-part Central Hudson test.Similarly, (2)'s beyond dispute, and Judge Callahan's opinion says so itself:  "On appeal [in Actmedia], we applied the test for laws that burden commercial speech set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Sticking with the Spielberg/movie theme from the last few days, today's post deals with the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in Hudson v. [read post]