Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC" Results 41 - 60 of 303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The case was covered by Hugh Tomlinson QC in the following Inforrm post. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
– Philip Steele News: Privacy injunction granted against the Sun, first reported privacy injunction of 2017 Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimant’s evidence and defendant’s closing submissions Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment – Hugh… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
One of the barristers present, Hugh Tomlinson QC of Matrix chambers, is also the editor of the Inforrm media blog. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
 Online Publication Claims: A Practical Guide edited by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Guy Vassall-Adams QC, Matrix Chambers, 2017. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
One of the issues lawyers often get asked by their clients is what steps they can take to get unlawful or offensive content removed from the internet without having to bring legal proceedings. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
In the interests of full and frank disclosure, it should be noted that one of the book’s editors is the leading media law QC, Hugh Tomlinson who is one of the creators of the Inforrm Blog on which this review appears. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:54 am by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills are members of Matrix Chambers and authors of Online Publication Claims: a Practical Guide. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:55 am by INFORRM
Guy Vassall-Adams QC and Hugh Tomlinson QC are members of Matrix Chambers and the editors of Online Publication Claims: a Practical Guide. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am by INFORRM
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven The Perils of “Revenge Porn”… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The finding was not disturbed by the Supreme Court of Canada (noted by Hugh Tomlinson QC). [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 7:15 am by INFORRM
The most popular Inforrm posts of the summer covered a variety of themes: News: Defamation and “Serious Harm” Court of Appeal dismisses Lachaux appeal Seamus Milne and the ‘Mystery Blonde’: Five years after Leveson the press still ignores privacy – Hugh Tomlinson QC Newspapers how near is the end? [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 The top ten posts of the past 12 months were as follows: Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Libel Trial, Day 3: Claimants closing submissions, judgment reserved Is there is any difference between the public interest and the interest of the public – Brian Cathcart… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down judgment in the controversial case of Google Inc v Equustek Solutions  (2017 SCC 34) dismissing Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results (2014 BCSC 1063). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:22 am by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is the joint author of The Law of Human Rights, 2nd Edn, OUP, 2009, and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:55 am by INFORRM
In the case of Giesbert v France ([2017] ECHR 504, 1 June 2017)(French only) the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that Court orders made against the magazine, Le Point, sanctioning the publication of criminal court documents in the high profile “Bettancourt” case did not violate Article 10 of the Convention. [read post]