Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC"
Results 101 - 120
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2017, 6:33 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
The claimant resisted this argument based on the decision in Dingle v Associated Newspapers ([1964] QC 371) in which it was held that, at common law, other publications to the same effect as the words complained of or relating to the same incident, are inadmissible in relation to the assessment of general damages for injury to reputation. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
In the case of Hurbain v Belgium [2021] ECHR 544 (in French only), the European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), held that an order to anonymise an article in a newspaper’s electronic archive (which referred to a person’s involvement in a fatal road traffic accident for which they were subsequently convicted) did not breach the applicant publisher’s right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
In the case of Stichting Ostade Blade v Netherlands (App 8406/06, 27 May 2014) the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an Article 10 application by a Dutch magazine arising out of a police raid was inadmissible. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
In the case of Guseva v Bulgaria (Judgment of 17 February 2015) a Chamber of the Court of Human Rights has again recognised an Article 10 right to access to information and found a violation where a public authority had failed to provide public interest information despite court orders. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
In the second part of this three part series, first posted in March 2010, Hugh Tomlinson QC looks at the development of the “right to reputation” in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In the final part of this three part series, first posted in March 2010, Hugh Tomlinson QC looks at the balancing of reputation and expression in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the implications for domestic law. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:02 am
In this three part series, first posted in March 2010, Hugh Tomlinson QC looks at the development of the case law relating to Article 8 of the European Court of Human Rights, the development of the right to reputation and its potential implications for domestic law. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:42 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC has a wide-ranging practice in both private and public law. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:07 pm
The decision of the Court of Human Rights in Novaya Gazeta v Russia ([2013] ECHR 251) is an interesting reminder of the requirement of journalistic responsibility even in the context of public interest articles about politicians. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
In the case of Ion Cârstea v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:24 pm
For 70 years the British press has resolutely resisted any form of independent regulation. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
On 11 June 2015, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia handed down judgment in the controversial case of Equuestek Solutions v Google Inc (2015 BCCA 265) dismissing Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results (2014 BCSC 1063). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law, Strasbourg: ML and WW v Germany, Article 8 right to be forgotten and the media – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills Case Law: Venables v News Group Papers, Application to Vary Confidentiality Injunction Dismissed, PJS extended – Samuel Rowe Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court abolished common law presumption of damage in libel cases – Mathilde Groppo Supreme Court considers social media defamation: context… [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 3:30 am
"From behind their cloak of anonymity, Dads Place used their publications and in particular the website to conduct a malicious, unpleasant and relentless campaign of libel and harassment," Hugh Tomlinson QC told the high court. ... [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC argued that the time had come to recognise an “image right” in English law. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:57 am
The UKSC Blog was conceived in 2009 by two individuals: Hugh Tomlinson QC of Matrix Chambers and Dan Tench, partner at CMS. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm
” Antony White QC Opinion: “Defamation and False Privacy” – Hugh Tomlinson QC Is following people illegal? [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
In the case of Almeida Leitão Bento Fernandes v. [read post]
