Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC"
Results 121 - 140
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
In the case of Niemela v Google (2015 BCSC 1024) the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed a claim for a worldwide interim libel injunction against Google by a Vancouver lawyer who had been subject to online abuse by someone he alleged to have been a former client and entered summary judgment for Google. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm
On 26 August 2015, Stephens J sitting in the Queen’s Bench Division in Northern Ireland, handed down judgment in the case of McAuley v Sunday Newspapers Ltd ([2015] NIQB 74). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
In the cases of Karácsony and v Hungary and Szél v.Hungary (applications nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13) decided on 16 September 2014 the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that financial sanctions imposed by the Speaker on demonstrating members of the opposition in the Hungarian Parliament were a violation of Article 10. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
In the case of Bleyer v Google ([2014] NSWSC 897) the Supreme Court of New South Wales stayed a libel action against Google Inc based on defamatory snippets because the resources of the court and the parties that would be expended were disproportionate to the plaintiff’s interest in obtaining vindication. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 6:21 am
The Top Ten posts for the last quarter have been Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck News: Hemming MP’s “super injunction victim” named as sex abuse fabricator Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC The Trafigura Story: who guards the Guardian? [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am
– Philip Steele News: Privacy injunction granted against the Sun, first reported privacy injunction of 2017 Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimant’s evidence and defendant’s closing submissions Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment – Hugh… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
Speakers included Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, PA Media Lawyer editor Mike Dodd and the journalist Heather Brooke. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:43 am
The Conference will feature the following speakers dealing with different aspects of the Defamation Bill: Responsible publication on matters of public interest Alistair Mullis, Professor of Law at the University of East Anglia Qualified Privilege, Responsibility for Publication and Multiple Publications Gill Phillips, Head of Legal at Guardian Media Group Honest Opinion and Truth Defences Mark Thomson, Atkins Thomson and Lorna Skinner, Matrix Chambers Trivial libels,… [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 3:24 am
The top 10 posts of 2018 were as follows (in descending order) Top 10 Defamation Cases of 2017, a selection – Suneet Sharma Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark judgment – Hugh Tomlinson QC Lord Hain and Privilege: When power, wealth and abuse combine to subvert the rule of law – Paul Wragg Data Protection: Overview of the Case Law in 2017 Case Law: LJY v Persons… [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 5:31 am
The top 10 posts of 2016 were as follows (in descending order) Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills How to avoid defamation – Steven Price News: Daily Mail loses Human Rights Act challenge to CFA success fees and insurance premiums Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Media and Information Cases before the Appellate and European Courts in 2016 [Updated3] News:… [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:45 pm
Secondly, at 3.40pm what appears to be a “claimants’ group” of Hugh Tomlinson QC, Gideon Benaim and Alasdair Pepper. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 7:15 am
The most popular Inforrm posts of the summer covered a variety of themes: News: Defamation and “Serious Harm” Court of Appeal dismisses Lachaux appeal Seamus Milne and the ‘Mystery Blonde’: Five years after Leveson the press still ignores privacy – Hugh Tomlinson QC Newspapers how near is the end? [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader by that of the twitter troll? [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Case Law, Canada: Equustek Solutions v Jack, worldwide injunction against Google ordering removal of websites from search results – Hugh Tomlinson QC Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:16 am
– Judith Townend Case Law: CTB v News Group Newspapers: privacy law and the judiciary – Edward Craven Privacy law: the super-injunction is dead Case Law: Mosley v United Kingdom: pre-notification rejected by Strasbourg – Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Goodwin v NGN – Privacy, Intrusion and Novelty – Mark Thomson Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC … [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:03 pm
The top ten posts of the past 12 months (from a wide range of authors)were as follows: Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills How to avoid defamation – Steven Price News: Daily Mail loses Human Rights Act challenge to CFA success fees and insurance premiums Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, “Serious Harm” under the Defamation Act 2013 and the drawing of inferences – Hugh… [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
The top ten posts of the past 12 months were as follows: Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Libel Trial, Day 3: Claimants closing submissions, judgment reserved Is there is any difference between the public interest and the interest of the public – Brian Cathcart… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:07 am
Opening the application, Hugh Tomlinson QC for the claimant said the case was not about the private information – which the court had held should not be published – but about the right to open justice the public had a right to know why the injunction was granted but no right to know anything about the private information. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
The proposal is written by Hugh Tomlinson QC and emerged out of roundtable discussions organized by the Media Standards Trust, and the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:00 pm
In light of this, Hugh Tomlinson QC asks whether a “right to freedom of information” is evolving through human rights case law in an interesting piece on the International Form for Responsible Media Blog (Inforrm). [read post]
