Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC" Results 121 - 140 of 303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2014, 9:31 am by INFORRM
Ashley Hurst, Olswang LLP Peter Jukes, author of Beyond Contempt: the Inside Story of Phone Hacking Trial Alasdair Pepper, Carter-Ruck David Price QC of David Price, Solicitors and Advocates; Mark Stephens, Howard Kennedy FSI Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Visit the website to view the latest agenda here. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
– Rhory Robertson and Tom Double Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v Germany (No.3), Glossing over Privacy – Alexia Bedat Case Law, Strasboug: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll Phone Hacking Trial: Brooks agreed £200,000 deal with Max Clifford to settle hacking lawsuit – Martin Hickman Privacy and Defamation, Strasbourg blurs the boundaries – Hugh Tomlinson QC… [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
For an overview of the Royal Charter System see The New UK Model of Press Regulation, Hugh Tomlinson QC, LSE Media Policy Brief No.12. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
  The top 5 posts on Inforrm this week were Facebook’s Community Standards: Severed heads are okay, but nipples are bad (unless accompanied by a baby) – Gideon Benaim and Jon Oakley Law and Media Round Up – 4 August 2014 Case Law: PNM v Times Newspapers, Open justice and reporting information about a suspect – Hugh Tomlinson QC The Sun just keeps getting it wrong on human rights – Adam Wagner Case Law: R (T) v Secretary of State for… [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am by INFORRM
In the case of Stichting Ostade Blade v Netherlands (App 8406/06, 27 May 2014) the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an Article 10 application by a Dutch magazine arising out of a police raid was inadmissible. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
He accepted the argument of Hugh Tomlinson QC (for the Claimants) that “in the world in which Google Inc operates, the location of documents is likely to be insignificant, since they are likely to be in electronic form, accessible from anywhere in the world”. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
We had a piece on the issue a few weeks ago by Hugh Tomlinson QC (“Leveson, “secret arrests” and the rights of suspects: a question of balance“) and a news report on the Judge’s response to the Contempt of Court Consultation and the reaction of the Sun. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Matthew Nicklin and Justin Rushbrooke of 5RB have been appointed as QCs. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
Concerns have been expressed by Hugh Tomlinson QC on this blog that this would be easy to satisfy and would significantly weaken the protection of the right of reputation in English law. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Mail on Sunday and the Daily Telegraph are alarmed about ‘secret arrests’ – which, as usual, they blame on Lord Justice Leveson. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The decision of the Court of Human Rights in Novaya Gazeta v Russia ([2013] ECHR 251) is an interesting reminder of the requirement of journalistic responsibility even in the context of public interest articles about politicians. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  It said (rejecting an argument attributed to Mr Mosley’s Counsel, Lord Pannick QC – see his speech here) “Although punitive fines or criminal sanctions could be effective in encouraging compliance with any pre-notification requirement, the Court considers that these would run the risk of being incompatible with the requirements of Article 10 of the Convention. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Sweden, Copyright versus Freedom of Expression II – Dirk Voorhoof and Inger Høedt-Rasmussen Briefing Note on Exemplary Damages and Costs – Gill Phillips The fundamental right to insult our leaders: Three worrying cases in France, the West Bank and right here – Adam Wagner Leveson, Article 10 and Apologies: another red herring – Hugh Tomlinson QC Privacy, Monstering and the Press: the case of Lucy Meadows The Leveson press freedom law that the… [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC, chair of Hacked Off, says “There is no substance in the argument that exemplary damages are somehow incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights”. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
The CPS made an announcement about Operation Weeting, the Metropolitan Police’s investigation into phone hacking. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 7:33 am by INFORRM
Hacking, blagging and bribing were, for many years, standard journalistic techniques in parts of the British press. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Claimants included the Duchess of York, James Blunt, Christopher Eccleston,Uri Geller and Hugh Grant, as reported by Press Gazette. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am by INFORRM
The Leveson Report is a careful compromise designed to protect both freedom of expression and privacy. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm by Sam Murrant
Also of interest here is this post by Hugh Tomlinson QC, who disagrees with Chakrabarti and points out that she has been misrepresented (she did not, in fact, say that the Leveson proposals, if enacted, would be illegal or incompatible with the HRA). [read post]