Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes" Results 1 - 20 of 3,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2006, 11:58 am
Sisler.What the article does not mention is that the lawyers in Hughes v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0562, 2011 MT 189, JAMES HUGHES and RHEA HUGHES, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:16 am by scanner1
PATRICK HAROLD HUGHES, Defendant and Appellee. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:31 am by ernst
Now available on-line to subscribers to Cambridge Core: the Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise volume on the Supreme Court under Charles Evans Hughes, The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930 to 1941, by Mark V. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:01 pm by Pamela Fasick
Oral Argument in Sexual Harassment Case Was Heard on April 7During its April 7th Oral Argument session the California Supreme Court heard arguments in the sexual harassment action Hughes v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
McInnes devotes an entire chapter to Hughes’ judicial role in the notorious case of Thatcher v Thatcher. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:58 am by Ted Frank
A class action brought on behalf of California consumers alleging inferior speeds of Hughes Internet service and unfair charges of early termination fees. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:14 am by sally
Hughes v Borodex Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 425; [2010] WLR (D) 106 “A tenant who had made extensive improvements at her own expense to the flat which she held on a long residential tenancy was not entitled to have those improvements disregarded by a Rent Assessment Committee fixing the rent of the new assured periodic tenancy of the same premises. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
Regina v Hughes (James) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The statutory right of a single appeal to the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division was not removed when the Attorney-General referred the case to that court, since the defendant had not exercised his right to appeal. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 12:23 pm
His references of preliminary questions to the European Court of Justice demonstrated, among other things, how effectively he could construct a set of questions in order to sharpen the minds of jurists in Luxembourg (as in Zino Davidoff v A&G) and how boldly (in Arsenal v Reed) he could resist their responses when it seemed to them that the senior European court had usurped his own judicial functions as a trial judge. [read post]