Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 9:09 am
Here’s the abstract: In Hughes v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court’s January 24, 2022 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Alabama, Nixon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:25 am
Today the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:29 am
Hughes v Borodex Ltd Court of Appeal “A landlord was entitled to serve notice to quit on a tenant who lost her protected tenancy by carrying out improvements in the property which resulted in its rent exceeding the assured protected tenancy limit. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 6:42 am
At the end of this month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Hughes v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:03 am
Case Citation: Hughes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
Trussing chickens is not manual handling Hughes v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:07 am
Regina v Hughes (James) [2009] EWCA Crim 841; [2009] WLR (D) 160 “The words ‘or in subsequent proceedings’ in s 9(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 did not enable a defendant to appeal against a sentence passed by the Court of Appeal on an Attorney General's reference, but his right of appeal still remained extant [...] [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:51 am
By Jason Rantanen Enfish v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:14 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
The South African sage noted how, in Wagamama, things had actually got off to a great start, what with Advocate General Jacobs' subsequent express endorsement in Puma v Sabel of Sir Hugh's finding that that the function of a trade mark is as a badge of origin, not to mention the definitive rejection in that case of Benelux notions of assessment of likelihood of association. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 5:45 am
Hughes v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:46 am
Butler (1936); and before both Hughes and Roberts voted to invalidate provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 in Carter v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:03 am
Criminal procedure — Expert witness — Text messages sent by defendant Robert Shawn Hughes, appellant, was convicted following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County of possession of Oxycodone with the intent to distribute, possession of heroin with the intent to distribute, possession of heroin, and possession of cocaine. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 4:07 pm
For more on this action, see SEC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Hughes and others v Bourne and others [2012] EWHC 2232 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 242 “The personal representatives’ power of appropriation under section 41(1) of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 was not confined to transactions of a contractual or quasi-contractual nature. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:39 am
Hughes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:13 am
Alabama, Nixon v. [read post]
