Search for: "Hughes v. Malone" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
Malone, 503 F.3d 481 (6th Cir. 10/4/07) (McKeague, Sutton, JJ., & Forester, D.J. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Robert Malone     Eastern District of Michigan at Flint 09a0068n.06  USA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Robert Malone     Eastern District of Michigan at Flint 09a0068n.06  USA v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
Perry, Jerome Arechigo, John Holly, Gregory Perry, Shane Arneson, Mark Hughes, John Peterson, Todd Ayers, David L. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
  As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]