Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Patel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:41 am
Facts: This case (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:29 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
We’re returning to the topic of implied Buckman preemption today to discuss three recent decisions, Hughes v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
ComptonCitizenship, Gender, and Conscience: United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 1:19 pm
Kagan then queried whether Arizona v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:38 am
The article states that Hughes lived in a condominium complex with his mother. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:52 am
Bufkin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
In Jones v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:32 pm
Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 12:56 am
State of Uttar Pradesh ([1964] 1 SCR 332). [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:26 pm
United States (1926) with Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
There were no school rules prohibiting running in the walkway; a point noted by the trial judge His Honour Judge Iain Hughes. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm
Towards the end of his post this morning, Richard brings up an interesting issue that arose during arguments in Hughes v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
The reference, of course, was to Chief Justice Hughes who presided over the United States Supreme Court from 1930 to 1941. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:39 pm
Stachon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Hughes v. [read post]
