Search for: "Hughes v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 7:14 am
Hughes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
In a recent Supreme Court of Canada decision, Newfoundland and Labrador v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered two Supreme Court cases: Florida v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am
Nearly two decades later, Marshall used the same tactic to confirm the superiority of federal constitutional review over that of the state courts in Cohens v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
And: William V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
And the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Superior Court (2009) and Hughes vs. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Superior Court (2009) and Hughes vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
These are analogous powers that the English Superior Courts had under the prerogative writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus and quo-warranto. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:08 am
Earlier this month, in Hughes v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 am
They are also now big, big litigation.You might think that last week's decision in Hughes v Mylan, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:14 am
"Brown v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Among the more recognizable authors of Halsburys Laws of Canada are Governor General David Johnson, Law Deans Lorne Sossin, Bruce Feldthusen, and Philip Bryden, and Justices Allen Linden and Roger Hughes, Master Linda Abrams, and Tribunal Chair Donald Buckingham. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Hughes, R.J. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
Shane Robert Hughes et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
As the Hughes court put it: In Zhang v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Hugh R. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:16 pm
Concluding that the supervisor’s alleged tortious conduct was not carried out as part of the employer’s business, a federal district court in New Mexico granted partial summary judgment to the employer, rejecting the employee’s contention that the employer was liable based on a respondeat superior theory. [read post]
