Search for: "Hughes v. Unknown"
Results 1 - 20
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
In the case of Brett Wilson LLP v Persons Unknown ([2015] EWHC 2628 (QB))(16 September 2015) Warby J granted a permanent injunction against the unknown operators of the “Solicitors from Hell UK” website. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Alabama, Nixon v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:17 am
On 11 November 2011, Mr Justice Tugendhat granted an injunction to prohibit the harassment of actress Ting Lan Hong and her baby, the daughter of the actor Hugh Grant, by paparazzi photographers. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 9:13 am
Alabama, Nixon v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Barnwell Bros., Inc., Lane v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Hughes v Borodex Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 425 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of the appeal from the High Court decision on first appeal that we reported in March 2009. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:58 pm
Hughes v Borodex Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 425 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of the appeal from the High Court decision on first appeal that we reported in March 2009. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm
A similar issue arose in Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 127. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information practice group. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:15 am
Persons Unknown [2010] EWHC 119 (QB) [2010] EMLR 16 at page 400 at para 138?. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:16 am
The Texas Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 2:45 am
Bastien v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
In the case of Ion Cârstea v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
G was, the Court observed, a private person unknown to the general public at the time of his request for anonymisation (with that date and not date when the Article was first published being the relevant date). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm
They were not, therefore, private persons unknown to the public at the time they made their requests (some 11 years before this judgment was handed down) [106]. iii. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:07 am
Odena v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:56 pm
Citing a 2008 Seventh Circuit case that in turn quotes the 1987 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
If the words would be so understood by such people it is not necessary for the claimant to prove that there were in fact such people, who read the offending words; so an individual defamed by name in Cornwall has a cause of action even if he was unknown in that county at the time of publication [15](2). [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
