Search for: "Hughes v. Washington" Results 141 - 160 of 279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
” Another look at the case comes from Patrick Hughes at Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:15 am by Quinta Jurecic
  According to Seamus Hughes of the George Washington University Program on Extremism, a review of recent federal court cases concerning threats against public officials shows a “meteoric rise” in threats since 2016. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm by Amy Howe
Another case granted today, Hughes v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2052 (1984); see also Feldman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:04 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At NYU Law Review Online, Matthew Christiansen previews next week’s oral argument in Hughes v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
This organization was instrumental in laying the groundwork for the civil rights cases that culminated in the landmark 1954 Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Eva Arevuo
Update:7/29/11: Mr Obama today accused House Republicans of pursuing a partisan bill that would force Washington into another debt limit fight within months. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  The actor Hugh Grant accused the Prime Minister of “extraordinary treachery” for abandoning Conservative government promises on press regulation. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Rodoy v Optical Express Limited and others KB-2023-002437. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Washington's State Apple Ass'n contended that the law discriminated against Washington apples which are shipped in containers that include its own tougher state grades. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]