Search for: "Humphrey v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2017, 4:19 pm by Aurora Barnes
Humphrey bar when state law expressly states that juvenile adjudications are not criminal convictions, and juveniles are not afforded basic constitutional protections required for criminal proceedings. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:02 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Foster v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 5:09 pm
"On the state court side, Westlaw gives the impression that Chief Justice Hassell, Justice Kinser, Justice Lemons, Chief Judge Felton, Judge Kelsey, Judge Humphreys, Judge McClanahan, and Senior Judge Coleman prefer "pled," but Judge Elder has more frequently used "pleaded," as did former Chief Justice Carrico.The U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Philip Thomas
On Thursday the Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed a $150,000 jury verdict in the Humphrey County Circuit Court in City of Belzoni v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:14 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Bishop v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:47 am by ADeStefano
(2) A known roadway hazard is a concurrent cause of an accident that is not superseded by driver negligence (citing Humphrey v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:10 am by Kent Scheidegger
Kentucky claim.The State's Brief in Opposition is here.The Court also took up a federal case, Lockhart v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 2:48 pm by Steve Minor
Gosney, the Court of Appeals in an opinion by Judge Petty, joined by Judges Humphreys and Chafin (so three of my favorites) held that a local department of social services is not a state agency for purpose of the application of the Administrative Process Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:51 pm by snahmod
There I briefly discussed the complicated issues of (1) choosing the right state statute of limitations, (2) accrual of section 1983 claims and (3) when section 1983 claims are […] [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The specific test for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits was set out in Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, where it was held that with questions of social and economic strategy the Court will generally respect the legislature’s policy choice unless it was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]