Search for: "Humphrey's Executor v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am by Michel Paradis
United States, the Supreme Court held as much. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
This modest slap on the wrist is strong evidence that the current conservative Justices will not take on the constitutional status of independent agencies, which were accepted in Humphrey’s Executor v, United States (1935), even though these could be challenged on the ground that the so-called “fourth branch” of government does not fit into the tripartite constitutional structure with its legislative, executive, and judicial branches. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In the standoff between Texas and the United States gov't over Gov. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
We opted not to include Myers and Humphrey's Executor; Morrison covers those issues well. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:30 pm by Kirti Datla
Moreover, our approach undermines enduring dicta in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm by John Ross
Concurrence: One of these days we should resolve what, if anything, is left of Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
In 1935, the Supreme Court ruled in Humphrey’s Executor that FDR acted illegally when he discharged FTC [read post]