Search for: "Humphrey v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2013, 3:51 pm by snahmod
There I briefly discussed the complicated issues of (1) choosing the right state statute of limitations, (2) accrual of section 1983 claims and (3) when section 1983 claims are […] [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The specific test for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits was set out in Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, where it was held that with questions of social and economic strategy the Court will generally respect the legislature’s policy choice unless it was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
United States (sustaining independent regulatory commissions) and Morrison v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm by Joseph Arshawsky
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post USA: Nobel Biocare Services AG v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:10 am by Cheryl Beise
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post USA: Cortes-Ramos v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 11:59 pm by Cheryl Beise
  More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post USA: Swartz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:05 am by Jody Coultas
Amazon.com, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 17-35173, 06 August 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
The Court of Appeal, relying on Lady Hale’s judgment in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] 1 WLR 1545, had considered that the case involved “discrimination in state benefits” and hence that the usually strict test for justification on grounds such as sex or disability gave way to the question of whether the Government’s approach was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:16 am by Joseph Arshawsky
Cosmetic Warriors Ltd., United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 17-55325, 29 June 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am by Peter Reap
Scrutinizer GmbH, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, No. 18-1195, 13 September 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm by Nicholas Kaster
Diamond Hong, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1688, 27 August 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 8:31 am by Joseph Arshawsky
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post USA: BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:23 am by Cheryl Beise
  More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post USA: Ericsson Incorporated v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:09 am by Cheryl Beise
Focus Nutrition, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, No. 17-4126, 26 June 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]