Search for: "Humphrey v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sullivan, 658 F.2d 93, 96 n.4 (3d Cir. 1983) (en banc); Humphreys v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:12 am by Cheryl Beise
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Robert Margolis
Case date: 19 February 2019 Case number: No. 18-60144 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:44 am by Thomas Long
The appellate court reversed a district court’s denial of the German company’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and remanded with instructions that the case be dismissed (C5 Medical Werks, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas, 14th Court of Appeals, issued an opinion recently styled, "Chester Humphrey v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:11 am by Robert Margolis
Case date: 09 December 2019 Case number: No. 19-1760 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: TAGNETICS INC., Case No. 19‐30822 Judge Humphrey Chapter 7 Decision Granting Petitioning Creditors’ Motion for Contempt (Doc. 145) and Determining Additional Interest as a Remedy to Enforce Compliance This matter is before the court on the Motion to Hold Tagnetics in Indirect Contempt (doc. 145) (the “Motion”), filed by petitioning creditors… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Some win their appeals pro se, which is noteworthy because they are not lawyers and face off against highly skilled state lawyers. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:32 am by Brian Craig
Case date:15 January 2019 Case number: No. 17-16815 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am by Jeffrey H. Brochin
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:37 am by Brian Craig
Case date: 29 January 2020 Case number: No. 18-51021 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
Humphrey and that he is in fact qualified to be President of the United States with all of the powers that entails. [read post]