Search for: "Humphreys v. Humphreys" Results 1 - 20 of 761
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2024, 9:36 am by fjhinojosa
Beck gave a CLE presentation to the Lubbock Area Bar Association titled “United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Supreme Court both explicitly upheld the constitutionality of the FTC’s commission structure in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Peter Shane
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—namely, that, following Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
In the post ZXC v Bloomberg era, the reasoning behind the Department of Justice’s decision to create a criminal offence to protect the same interests, and to extend its applicability to a quarter of a century after death, remains opaque. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Humphreys J stated that there had been “no debate around the issue of the public interest, relevant to the anonymity of suspects, nor any consideration of the need for a fair balance of rights. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am by Mark Ashton
The appellate opinion relies on the Supreme Court opinion in Humphreys v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Humphreys Ch. clarified that no permission for such actions was granted, and if this was required, a further petition must be brought [10]. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
  I think there’s also a decent chance the Court uses this case to overrule Humphrey’s Executor. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
Humphrey; Tribal Political Dissident) Brown, et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
With regard to the retrospective faculties/illegal actions, Humphreys Ch. said: [96]. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]